Laserfiche WebLink
VN-218 <br />Page #2 <br />In staff's opinion it is misfortunate that the error occurred and <br />that it would seem impractical at this time that the building <br />be moved to comply with LP-83. The warrants for the variance <br />appear to. include: <br />1. That. it would result in a hardship to require the <br />applicant to move the already.constructed 35280.3 square <br />foot building; <br />2. That it is an unique circumstance that a cent ified <br />certificate of survey is incorrect.and that the <br />building was built on good faith that it conformed with <br />approved building permit--,-LP-83.- <br />The-attached-survey also indicates that_there__.vras never an easement <br />recorded in regard to the 8" water main that exists along the <br />northern portion of this property. Therefore, the granting -of this <br />variance. should be subject to the applicant granting the City of <br />New Brighton a permanent.utility easement across the northern <br />20 feet of both-the applicant's parcels. This would correct a' <br />past oversight. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION CONSIDERTION AND RECOMMENDATIO <br />EXTRACT FROM MINUTES <br />BOARD OF REVIEW <br />REGULAR MEETING <br />NOVEMBER 18, 1980 <br />Staff briefly reviewed the request and indicated that the applicant <br />was unable to attend the'Board meeting. <br />Commissioner-Livingston voiced a concern over granting the variance <br />and felt there should be additional safeguards concerning outside <br />storage and landscaping. <br />Motion by Williams, second by Sande to waive the reading and adopt <br />a resolution recommending approval of variance application VN-218. <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br />Motion by Williams, second by Lang to recommend the approval of <br />the revision to LP-83 and that the revised survey be attached to <br />approved site.and landscape plans dated May 22, 1979 by the <br />applicant and City Planner. <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried