My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-234
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-234
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:58:04 AM
Creation date
3/12/2007 1:16:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXTRACT FROM MINUTES <br />NEW BRIGHTON PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MARCH 28, 1984. <br />Remington Builders - VN-231 <br />Ken Sjodin explained how the cul-de-sac on 26th Avenue NW <br />differed from the cul-de-sacs on Walnut Court North and <br />South, which. staff had used as a comparison. He stated the <br />~u;-de-sa:: on 26th Avenue cuts much deeper into the lot. <br />Cor:~missioner Livingston asked if alternative building layouts <br />had been considered. <br />Mr. Sjodin explained how the proposed site limited potential <br />building layouts. ' <br />Chairman Williams asked if the variance would impact the lot <br />to the south. <br />Staff stated it would not. <br />Motion by Williams, seconded by Baker to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br />10:10 P. <br />10:25 P <br />Commissioner Livingston stated that the developer was more at a risk <br />than anyone else and development of the site would be good for the City.. <br />Commissioner Baker stated that there was no mention of a need for a <br />variance when the land was platted, that the house could be moved to <br />reduce the variance, and that this was probably the wrong house design <br />for the iot. <br />Mr. Sjodin explained that the surveyor who platted the area has admitted <br />that he was using a 20 foot setback off-the cul-de-sac when the area <br />was platted. The surveyor was not aware of the correct setback <br />requirements. <br />Motion by Williams seconded by Baker to waive the reading and adopt <br />a RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP-231. <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.