Laserfiche WebLink
L <br />1 <br />1 <br />1.# <br />!_ <br />s <br />i< t • <br />4 - <br />L <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />r? <br /> <br />'s. <br />Page 4 - 1120-3932 <br />We anticipate relatively light structural loads. <br />The existing fill is composed primarily of miscellaneous debris with some <br />soil mixed with it. This fill would be unsuitable for support of any <br />building foundations or even the floor slab. In addition, the fill is <br />underlain in most areas with swamp deposits. It is quite probable that <br />the swamp deposits are still consolidating under the weight of the fill. <br />This additional consolidation is a significant factor in the design of <br />piles. <br />On the basis of the borings, it appears that it may be feasible to support <br />a portion of the structure on spread footing foundations. This would be <br />the extreme westerly portion of the building. We would suggest excavating <br />this area of all existing fill and any swamp deposits that may be encoun- <br />tered below the fill and placing a controlled,. compacted fill'to floor <br />elevation. Spread footings could then be supported directly on the <br />natural soil or compacted fill at minimum elevation. Where footings are <br />supported on compacted fill, the excavation and compacted fill should <br />extend beyond the edges of the footings a distance equal to the depth of <br />compacted fill beneath the footings. <br />In the majority of the site, the depth of fill and swamp deposits is too <br />deep to economically remove and replace with a controlled fill. This <br />process would be further complicated by the ground water level. Therefore, <br />it is our opinion that in the majority of the site, it would be necessary <br />to support both the structural frame and the floor. slah.cn'piling. •• The <br />piling should be driven through the fill and swamp deposits to an adequate <br />penetration into the underlying coarse alluvial depc_its. None of the <br />GC?f I'd-L1M