My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-243
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 201-300
>
VN-243
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 2:25:15 PM
Creation date
3/13/2007 1:09:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. <br />NEW BRIGHTON PLANNING COMMISSION <br />RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF <br />VN-243. <br />WHEREAS, an application for a variance has been made by <br />Thermo-King. <br />. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as <br />follows: <br />1. That an application for a variance was filed with <br />the City on August 2, 1985. <br />2. That the Planning Commission, pursuant to published <br />and mailed notices, held a public hearing on August 20, <br />1985, all person's present at the hearing were given an <br />opportunity to be heard. <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission that <br />the following Findings of Fact are made in respect to VN-243: <br />1. That the property is zoned I-1, Light Industrial. <br />2. That the maximum height of a fence permitted in a <br />front yard is 3 1/2 feet. <br />3. That the applicant is requesting a variance to allow <br />a seven-foot fence in a front yard. <br />4. That the applicant has not been able to adequately <br />demonstrate that unique and unusual circumstances <br />exist and that denial of the variance will result <br />in undue hardship. <br />5. That granting of a variance would be inconsistent <br />with Section 4-540 (a), purpose of the fence ordinance, <br />because of the possibility of parking and outside <br />storage encroaching into the front yard setback, thus <br />affecting orderly development of the property. <br />6. That the items identified by the applicant as reasons <br />for a variance (the existing well and snow storage) <br />can be addressed in alternative ways than a variance. <br />7. That the excessive right-of-way along 01d Highway 8 <br />does not constitute undue hardship, by requiring the <br />fence to be located 90 feet from the curb, because the <br />proper fence location will not cause the applicant's <br />inability to operate a business on the site. <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application VN-243 is and <br />hereby recommended for denial. <br />Adopted this 20th day of August, 1985. <br />Roger S. Williams, Chairman <br />f Brenda A. Krueger, City Planner
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.