Laserfiche WebLink
ti ~ <br />~~ ~ ~ <br />February 17, 1981 <br />• To: John R. Grau, Acting City Manager <br />From: Maurice H. Anderso ~,~irector Park and Recreation <br />Re: Long Lake Park Development <br />~ have assembled some of the most recent staff memos and Council <br />Resolutions regarding Long Lake Park for the Council to review. <br />Hopefully this will provide some background information and put <br />the problem/opportunity into perspective. <br />I would like to note that the Council can indicate a willingness <br />to fund operations and maintenance of a regional park without <br />giving a specific guarantee as to amount. At this juncture it <br />is also not necessary to commit to any specific level of develop- <br />ment. If the Metropolitan Council should change its policy and <br />allow the City to have implementing ~.gency status, the City <br />would have to prepare, officially adopt, and secure approval from <br />Metro Council of a master plan for development, maintenance and <br />operation of the site. This process gives the City ample oppor- <br />tunity to negotiate on all aspects of the project. <br />• If the City. were to receive implementing agency status, it would <br />be expected to develop, operate and maintain both the Rush Lake <br />and Long Lake portion of the park since there is little possibility <br />that Metro Council would ever allow development of a 109 acre re- <br />gional park. <br />The policy change we would be requesting requires a public hearing <br />in addition to deliberation and discussion by both the Parks and <br />Open Space Commission as well as the Metropolitan Council. This <br />process would take about two months and frankly is not likely to <br />be favorably received. <br />If the Council is serious about the possibility of proceeding with <br />local development either as an alternative to regional development <br />or as a back-up position in the event Metro Council will not change <br />its policy, then staff should be directed to submit a Lawcon grant <br />application for 1982 development. This grant application process <br />could run parallel to our request to Metro Council. The Lawcon <br />grant process would require a $37,500 commitment in the 1982 CIP <br />for Long Lake development. The maximum grant funding is $150,000 <br />of which 25s must be local match. <br />If the Council wishes "regional" development in 1981, or "local" <br />and Lawcon development in 1982, action should be taken by March 10, <br />1981. The Lawcon grant process makes the time constraints quite <br />• severe. <br />