My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 07-15-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 07-15-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 12:49:06 PM
Creation date
3/15/2007 11:42:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 15, 1981 Park Board Minutes Page 3 <br />Grimshaw saidhe wants,to see us get started on the park. it <br />• would be nice. if we, oould hold onto the check but if it's not <br />feasible, he basically supports the :joint powers agreement. <br />Gunderman said we have asked Met Council'if we could hold onto <br />the land. They said there isn't anyway to be the implementing <br />agency. <br />Johnson said we should hold out as long as we can. <br />Gunderman said if New Brighton doesn't tike development money, <br />they can spend the money somewhere else. <br />Johnson' said they want the landodeveloped as a regional park <br />and we should use that as leverage. <br />Anderson said they have other sites to be developed they could <br />use the money for. He was guessing that possibly this year and <br />next year the City might possibly get reimbursement but after <br />that possibly no. Don't see any legal way to develop the park <br />if the land is leased from the City. Metro Council needs the <br />title transfer. <br />Johnson said we went through a similar thing with the golf course <br />and it was legal. <br />• Anderson said it was not the same. <br />Gunderman asked Johnson what would you recommend <br />Johnson said lease the land and we maintain ownership. we can <br />reevaluate that in 3 or 4 years. <br />Gunderman said there is close to $3 million development scheduled <br />on our property. Met Council will not do that based on a lease. <br />Carlson asked why the joint powers agreement was set up for 1984 <br />review. The development will not have been completed by then. <br />Understand the reasons given at the last meeting but can it be <br />written for a longer period of time. <br />Anderson said that Met Council will probably go along. Ramsey <br />County probably wouldn't., The Board is very determined. They <br />will get money from Met Council for operation and maintenance. <br />The date could have been earlier or later but it was Met Council <br />who-helped set the date: <br />Johnsop said if we default, it doesn't matter because Ramsey <br />County has the land. If we back out there is no recourse. <br />Hogan said he can appreciate Met Council's position in not <br />wanting to give up the money to something not owned..., <br />• Dahl stated she keeps hearing from the Park Board tha.they <br />want guarantees, If we are going after something guaranteed.,... , <br />the park will never be developed. The Statement of Understanding <br />covers what we talked about at the last meeting. We have a commitm( <br />to our residents and to Ramsey County residents in support of Ramse', <br />County,
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.