PRECM 06-03-1981 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,' r \.CL~UL,Y i E_ • NEW BRIGHTON PARK BOARD MINUTES JUNE 3, 1981 I. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Gunderman at 7:30 p.m. II. Members present: Carlson, Dahl, Gunderman, Hogan, Olson, Solberg, Van Hatten, Council Representative Schmidt Members absent: Grimshaw, Johnson arrived 8:20 III. Correction to the Minutes of May 6, 1981 are as follows (VII. Announcements} Motion by Johnson, seconded by Van Hatten, to recommend to the Council that thank you letters be sent to the Girl Scouts and Brownies for their help with the New Brighton clean up. Motion passed. IV. Correspondence A. Council Report Schmidt said the Rice Creek Watershed disposal site was approved. Material and labor for the Golf Course electrical work was approved. There was final approval given on the con- dominiums on County Road E and Silver Lake Road - 80 units. There was a proposal for condominiums next to UOP on the Rush Lake site. The Council did .not feel the proposal was consis- tent with the comprehensive plan and suggested the developer come back with similar proposal for offices. V. New Business A. Long Lake (Update) Anderson said he went to Met Council with our proposal. Before the Monday morning meeting, Perovich went down to the Ramsey County Public Works Committee fora meeting. The Public Works 'Committee backed down from their original stand and said they .would like to negotiate with New Brighton. Perovich stated that Ramsey County was in fact interested in being involved with Long Lake so why was New Brighton requesting implementing agency status. The item was tabled for two weeks or until further development. Anderson and the Mayor decided not to do a thing until. the County makes a proposal. -About 4:00 this afternoon Anderson was given a draft proposal from Ramsey County which has not been reviewed yet. By the July Park Board meeting there .should be something concrete from Ramsey County. If something comes of it, fine ~ otherwise we"ve-lost a month of time. Solberg commented that Perovich was vehemently against anyone but the County being implementing agency. Gunderman said he and Johnson spoke with Perovich and expressed the view that New Brighton will not wait years - let's get the job done. If Ramsey County won't, Anoka County will. There are advantages to .Anoka County with the trail systems. An alterna- tve would be making New Brighton implementing agency.