My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 05-06-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 05-06-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:09:02 AM
Creation date
3/15/2007 11:56:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 6, 1981 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 2 <br />Anderson said to improve the pond or lagoon area.. It was funded <br />several years ago with the majority of the money being from the <br />federal government. <br />Gunderman asked what.-will cause. it not to happen again. <br />Anderson said they have removed erosion problems upstream and <br />think that will help. They also have a settling. pond which they <br />hope will help the problem. There are plans to straighten the <br />channel. The plan will go to the EQC and then to the Council. <br />Work will begin late this summer. <br />Van Hatten asked how deep the material will be. <br />Anderson said 15-20 feet. <br />Carlson asked if there was anything the Park Board could. do to <br />encourage the dredging of the channel or at least up to-it. <br />The channel is shallow. If the posts are removed., that takes <br />away the visual awareness to slow down. It could be dangerous <br />for those that do not .know the lake. <br />Anderson suggested that this be included in the motion. <br />Van Hatten asked how they will get the sludge to the top of the <br />hi 1. <br />Anderson said they will pipe it there. <br />Gunderman asked if any of the material removed from the lake could <br />be used for the road. <br />Anderson said it's not good material for that purpose and can be <br />better utilized in other areas of the park. <br />Motion by Dahl, seconded by Van Hatten, to approve the dredging <br />disposal .sites at Long Lake Park.. Motion passed. <br />Motion by Van Hatten, seconded by Johnson, to add to the motion <br />that the channel be deepened. Motion passed.. <br />B. Ice Surface Debris <br />Anderson said-the debris is the worst he has ever seen on the lake. <br />The DNR also received alot of complaints and have hauled clot of <br />debris off the akes. Our Maintenance crew and volunteers also <br />hauled off much of the debris. Bensing, in his letter, is asking <br />if there is anything that can be Gone in the future to avoid-this <br />problem. The DNR was no help. The City could have an ordinance <br />but it has to be enforced. It is very hard to enforce because you <br />have o actually see someone violating the ordinance. The law <br />is strict but hard to enforce. The only suggestion he has is to <br />clean up-every year as we have been. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.