My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 03-03-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 03-03-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:08:10 AM
Creation date
3/15/2007 12:00:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NEW BRIGHTON PARK BOARD MINUTES <br />MARCH 3~ 19.81 <br />I. The meeting was called to order at 7:.30 p,m. by Chairperson Gunderman. <br />II. All members were present <br />III. Minutes of the February 3, 1981 meeting were approved as submitted. <br />IV. Correspondence <br />A. Council Report <br />Council Representative Schmidt summarized what had happened at the <br />Council meeting. Of main concern to the Park Board was the testing <br />that was going on at the Long Lake site by the PCA. Schmidt commented <br />that the-City is trying to get cost figures on the clean-up of the <br />oil on the site. <br />Anderson said the City is applying for a permit for clean up but <br />feels the PCA may still require more tests of the area to determine <br />what method of clean up may be used. It is possible that the waste <br />may be incorporated into asphalt niix. This will not be free but it <br />will be cheaper than if it has to be hauled out of .State. <br />Solberg asked if there is hazardous waste involved. <br />Anderson said yes. He feels PCA will require extra testing because <br />they cannot tell us how to dispose of it unless they know what is <br />in it. <br />Carlson asked how large an area was affected. <br />Anderson said about. 100 feet by 200 feet on our side. On the rail <br />road portion it is less concentrated but a larger area.. Ours.`s <br />2-3 feet of sludge. Our portion is ..,more of a problem. Time has <br />solved much of the railroad's problems. They will have to plug up <br />a well which will be costly. <br />Schmidt recalled it was something like 2,000 feet of sludge we <br />needed to dispose of. <br />Solberg was worried that this disposal process may take a very.. <br />long time. <br />Anderson said he hoped it would be done this year. He feels we <br />should spend the money for the clean up. <br />Van Hatten asked what kind of soil was in that area. <br />Anderson said sand. He added that there is a heavy clay area be- <br />neath and as far as we can tell, the waste has not penetrated the <br />clay.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.