My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 02-03-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 02-03-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:07:42 AM
Creation date
3/15/2007 12:02:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />' f'ebruary 3, 1981 Park Board Minutes <br />Page 3 <br />i Anderson explained that the next map showed barriers, identi- <br />fied railroad tracks, freeways, and Long Lake barriers. <br />Johnson asked Anderson to define barrier. <br />Anderson explained that this was something physical that was <br />preventing people from getting to a park, i.e.~railroad tracks, <br />freeways, lakes, etc. <br />Grimshaw asked if the width of a road determined <br />whether or not it was considered a barrier. If the road <br />was wide enough, bicycles and walkers could get to the park. <br />Anderson answered no; width does not dermine whether it is barrier <br />Dahl asked if perhaps there should be a map of existing trails. <br />Anderson felt there wasn't enough to show ,on a map. We only <br />have one trail system in our parks. <br />Anderson stated the next page showed the national standard. <br />With our facilities and school facilities we meet or exceed <br />the .standard in almost every category. <br />-Dahl felt it would be easier to understand if there were some- <br />• thing stated in regard to park and 'recreation and goals and <br />objectives- before the national standard. <br />Anderson stated he did it this way because typically it has <br />been done this way in other Cities. Wants to show that we <br />are working toward goals and objectives. The order being <br />what we have, what our standards are and-then our goals. <br />Dahl expressed concern with the page titled "Park and~Recrea- <br />tiorial Open Space." She felt the .park philosophy done by a <br />Park Board sub group should.. be inserted in this page.. <br />Anderson said he will rewrite it and submit it<to the-Park <br />Board at the next meeting. <br />Anderson commented that the order will be determined at a <br />later date when the content is updated and completed to the <br />Park Board's satis'factign. ' <br />Carlson asked if all school ,district property was included in <br />".Open Space" section or just those where we have joint powers <br />a•greements,. <br />Anderson responded it included all schools. <br />Grimshaw suggested showing existing schools along with parks <br />. on the "Determination of Needs".page. <br />On the "Determination of Needs." page Dahl asked if the. 236 <br />,acres applied to population <br />Anderson said yes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.