My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 01-07-1981
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1981
>
PRECM 01-07-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 4:07:22 AM
Creation date
3/15/2007 12:07:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 7, 1981 Pa"rk Board Minutes Page 3 <br />Gunderman commented on th'e Police section that the Park .Board <br />should have involvement and be part of the discussion to cover <br />the Park Board views, especially relating to Long Lake. <br />Gunderman asked if new vehicles were being considered for the <br />Police; maybe changing to station wagons to incorporate two <br />uses. <br />Benke. stated that new vehicles have not been a major discussion. <br />He feels the Police would like large, cars while the Council. is <br />concerned with .mileage, etc. One area being looked at is space <br />for paramedics: <br />Dahl asked when the City Manager was leaving. <br />Benke said the. end of January or l,st of February. Staff and <br />Council have been asked for recommendations for a new City <br />Manager. <br /> <br />• <br />Gunderman asked if the Park Berard could be part of the interview <br />process. Gunderman said he would like to provide prospective <br />and add input to what the~Park Board feels is important. <br />Benke commented that there may be an open session for this. <br />Van Hatten brought up his. concern of Veterans Park. He feels <br />it is a good idea to put Veterans Park on the agenda monthly <br />for update and review. The riew downtown development ~ub- <br />stantially affects Veterans Park. It seems`that the developers <br />intend to make many changes to the park. He feels the Council <br />or Park Board should state, on record, where it stands~on this <br />issue so that the developers hav an idea of the City's viewpoint. <br />Anderson responded that there°are two major plans being con- <br />sidered. The Council will choose between these at the next <br />meeting. Once staff has developed a plan, it will go to the <br />boards for recommendation and approval. .The Park Board will <br />have as much say as they want in the planning and can stay in- <br />volved to be sure concerns are met. <br />Benke commented that the Downtown Development Committee has con- <br />ferred with residents and they don't want to change the location <br />of the park: They don't want to see it across 10th Street. <br />Both plans submitted show the park this way.> The Council has tried <br />to keep the Park Board informed and. urges that a representative <br />attend each of the Downtown Development. meetings. <br />Benke stated there ar <br />the Park Board should <br />and be informed. <br />Van Hatten agreed to <br />garding Veterans Park <br />town Development will <br />e definite concerns relating to parks and <br />certainly stag close to what is happening <br />be a''represeritative for the Park Board re- <br />and the Downtown Development. The Down- <br />be put on the ..Park Board agenda each month. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.