My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 12-03-1980
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1980
>
PRECM 12-03-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:54:44 AM
Creation date
3/16/2007 7:41:29 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~~` NEW BRIGHTON PARK BOARD MINUTES <br />DECEMBER ~, 19$0 <br />~~ <br />I. The meeting was called to order at ?:30 by Chairperson Gunderman. <br />II. Members present: Dahl, Grimshaw, Gunderman, Johnson, Olson,. <br />Van Hatten, Council Rep. Benke <br />Members absent: Carlson, Hogan, Solberg <br />III. The minutes of the November 12, 1980 meeting were approved a~ sub- <br />mitted. <br />IV. Correspondence <br />A. Council Report <br />Councilman Benke reported that de,~isions on 1981-86 Capital Im- <br />provementsare still pending and that the Board should plan on <br />being involved in downtown planning as it affects Veterans Park. <br />Van Hatten asked if the Board should be reacting to plans now <br />being considered. <br />Benke responded that Board input was welcome at any stage of the <br />process. <br />• Van Hatten also expressed concern on behalf of the St. John's <br />Church Council that they be kept informed of potential changes <br />in Veterans Park. <br />V. New Business <br />A. 1980 MRPA Conference Report <br /> <br />Grimshaw reported that he felt his attendance at the MRPA Con- <br />ference was beneficial and he expressed appreciation to the City <br />for giving him an opportunity to attend. <br />VI. Old Business <br />A. Long Lake - Ramsey County Proposal Update <br />Staff reported that the County Board had sent the City's request <br />for a statement of the Board's intentions regarding Long Lake <br />Park back to committee for further study. It was also reported <br />that the Board may again consider the issue in January or per- <br />haps delay until the end of the upcoming legislative session. <br />The County Board has indicated a reluctance to decide on the <br />issue until the matter of funding for operations and maintenance <br />has been resolved by the legislature. <br />Gunderman stated that he feels the City should be actively con- <br />sidering all of its options for development of the site. Access <br />to the park site was discussed with concern expressed over the <br />County access being denied if the site is developed as a City <br />park. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.