My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 12-05-1979
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1979
>
PRECA 12-05-1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:48:20 AM
Creation date
3/16/2007 8:41:39 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r?oveznrer 3 0 , 1 °i 7 <br />'"o ° r?ec•~ Drightor? Park Roar~:~. <br />From ° "?lurice N. Pndersor , ?'irector Fark a.nr': I;ecrea.tion <br />Pe ° Comprehensive Par]; Flar.. <br />As you are ac,~are the Council has authorize. a corlprehensive <br />Fark stuc?y for 1980. I have hac' some preliminary discussion <br />~~ith three .firn.s; a plan?~ing firm?, a coz:~pany that specializes <br />ir_ surveys and an ac~vertisincs agency. 7'he full service pla,2n- <br />inn_ co_r!pary ha.s provi~ec? a prorosal for reviecz pur~~oses onlyi <br />it should hota~ever serve as ar excellent focus .for discussion <br />of the proj ect ~ The saarvey company I1as incAica.ted that they <br />could ego a statistically valid public opinion survey for. <br />~, Q04-~5, QOC anl;~ the ac~verti.sing agency feels that an ex- <br />pensive survey i~ a waste of ti?~.e . <br />I have k~riefly c;zscussed this matter ~:;~ith the City r`anager <br />and one of trse ap~tions discussed c,-as the c?epartr.?ent acting as <br />the coorc?inatinct agent ra.tl~er tl~ar_ buying a pacl~C~ge froze. a. <br />consulting f_irr~. This option ha_s the advantage of keincr less <br />expensive and/o:~ provic'ing rlcr_e information for the collars <br />availak le, howe~~er, it is rather ti;f~e consuming az•:c? given our <br />present staffing situatian, this oz~tioza is not as attractive <br />as It (nTOL21Ca norl±la.lly k:~e. <br />I c~~ould suc~ges~ a schedule siz^.ilar to the folloc,~ing <br />receznl~,er <br />January <br />Fek~ruary-Apr.: <br />r ~ a.y 1 <br />Determine scope a.nc_1 <br />Irterviec~T anc? Dire <br />Conduct stu~a~,T <br />Deceive resul-~s Gf <br />zr~etlioc~ of study <br />firm(s) <br />ctu~~y <br />I realize that this is a rather as-:~.k~itious schedule, ho~r~ever <br />this is the `"off season" for soT7e consulting firris and it <br />woulc_1 also I~~e ac~.vantageous to have the study coraplete~: k?y <br />late spring so elements of it could I::e incluc~eci ire the final <br />c?raft cf the City's Coznpreher..sive Plan . <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.