My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 11-08-1979
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1979
>
PRECM 11-08-1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 3:44:25 AM
Creation date
3/16/2007 9:17:41 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Park poard P°inutes °G- }Jc.}vernber ~, lP7n ._ . <br />P~tction by Da.I~l, seconc~ecz by Cunderm.an, that .the P.C: <br />Land Development be put bacl= in 1930 a.nd the Perron <br />property be pull.ec? out o <br />Johnson vaants Perron property to be in 1901. <br />Anderson stated that Perron property ~r?ill be resolved <br />in 1930. <br />Totion by Dahl, seconded by Cunderman, i:hat the above <br />Nation. be 4~ithdrawn and CIP items stay as they are. <br />:r-lotion passed.. motion ps.ssec? o <br />Anderson stated the grading of RCF land. may be done by <br />Earnst. In order to gradea he has to grade park. property. <br />Basic grading could be done early 1950, then it is open <br />.for designe <br />~'lomquist stated he is going to have to'r?ove alot of <br />material out of there. Once it°s out it°s going to <br />`be a loin area and caill _be a catch all and might be <br />potential for a moat. <br />Anderson said the grading plan s}~ouid. come to the Park <br />Board for discussion. <br />T~lotion k,y Carlson, seconc±ed by Dahl, to request the <br />Council to have°the City Engineer make a presentation <br />to the Park Boarc'c on the RCF grading 'plan before Council <br />approval. motion passed. <br />Anderson asked Blcm.quist if the RCI'' grading plans were <br />already approved. Blor?quist said r_o but-they are awfully <br />close. There is a potential for two feet of ~°ater on <br />the par}; . <br />Anderson stated he preferrec:: a limited number of projects <br />in 19£x0. ~Te ~,7ould like to catch up on existing projects. <br />?°}iat would give- time to work on Cor,prehensive Park Flan <br />anc~ start again on agood basis. <br />Dahl stated that the L~evelcpment of Louth Pike Lake <br />",rail. hac' beer_ in 1951:, ho~~T chid it get in 1981.? <br />t"otion by Dahl, seconded k:y ?^7estlinc~, to move mouth <br />Pike Lake Trail _rā¢evelopment back to 193Q. T~otion ?gassed. <br />Dahl stated the Development of youth Pike Lake Trail <br />needs to be tied more closely to the development of <br />Long Lake Park. <br />Dahl stated there is ro evidence of need for neca <br />shelter buildinn at Veterans Park iri 19551. It ~~~as <br />originally in 198~~. It is too early because the Com- <br />prehensive Park Plan is: not fnishedo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.