Laserfiche WebLink
The Council has very specific administrative responsibility in the regional <br />park system. The law provides that "the Metropolitan Counci-1 shall review, <br />with the advice of the Commission, each master plan to determine whether it is <br />consistent with the Council's policy plan." The law further provides that <br />"the Metropolitan Council, with the advice of the Commission, may make grants <br />from any funds available to it for recreation open space purposes, to any <br />municipality, park district or county located wholly or partially in the <br />Metropolitan Area, to cover the cost, or any portion of the cost, of acquiring <br />or developing regional recreation open space in accordance with the policy <br />plan." However, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Minnesota DNR are <br />not required to submit master plans to the Council for parks under their <br />jurisdiction that are part of the regional park system. And the Council cannot <br />make grants to either agency for purposes of acquiring or developing these <br />facilities. <br />U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Minnesota DNR actions that provide recreational <br />opportunity in the Metropolitan Area have a substantial impact on the Council's <br />plans for the regional park system. The concentration of state parks outside <br />the Metropolitan Area was a factor in the beginnings of the regional system. <br />The Hennepin County Park Reserve District was established in 1957 to provide <br />similar parks in Hennepin County. .Since then, the counties, together with the <br />park reserve district and a few municipalities, have. assumed primary <br />responsibility for providing regional recreation open space in this Area, with <br />regional administration provided by the Council and Commission. <br />There are two basic alternatives for addressing this issue. One would be to <br />retain the functional system approach, and ask the state legislature to require <br />the Minnesota DNR to submit master plans to the Council for state parks in the <br />Metropolitan Area, as well as the management plans it submits to the State <br />Planning Agency. <br />The second approach would be to remove state parks and federal units from <br />the regional park system. These complementary facilities would still be <br />considered in regional planning. <br />3. MASTER PLANS FOR REGIONAL RECREATION OPEN SPACE <br />Three questions regarding which. agencies should prepare master plans for <br />regional recreation open space should be addressed. <br />(1) Should municipalities be encouraged to submit master plans for <br />regional recreation. open space under their jurisdiction directly to <br />the Council? Or should.-counties and special. park districts prepare <br />countywide master plans that include appropriate municipally-owned <br />facilities? <br />The 1974 Metropolitan Parks Act defines and directs the preparation of master <br />plans for regional recreation open space. By definition, a master plan is <br />''a plan describing the boundaries of specific parks or other regional <br />recreation open space and the nature. of their development and use." <br />4 <br />