Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />PARK BOARD N7INUTES <br />WEDNESDAY, MACH 7 , x-979 <br />PAGE 2 <br />19.31 (Continued) <br />-Level of 866 is too low to close the lake. Only 6 times <br />in the last 35 sT®~1~~ Ilas high Water caused a problem. <br />Time restrictions are not needed9 they will cause safety <br />pr~h1_pms due to increased use at certain times. <br />-The time limit is too liberal and favors water skiers <br />too much. <br />19..32 -This section as presently worded is impossible to enforce. <br />19.33 -Strike "any place on shore': "Boat" should be changed <br />to "watercraft. <br />-Include definition of boat launch. <br />-Some provision should be made to provide for emergency <br />beaching of watercraft. <br />19.3- -Definition of "half of lake" is needed. <br />-Limitation on canoes is too strict. <br />19,35 -Wording is too confusing - people tend to assume that <br />clockwise is the preferred direction. <br />19.36b-define "motorized vehicle" <br />c-is too restrictive and will force people to break the law. <br />1.9 , 37 -Define term "probable danger . " <br />-There is a need for better dissemination of information <br />than merely posting at the launch area. <br />General Comments on Ordinance <br />-Suggest the Park Board change the scope of the ordinance <br />and come up with a plan to optimize use of the lake and <br />launch area and ~hoatresentoan opinionmofwthesplann. <br />should be asked p <br />-The Homeowners Assn. is not made up entirely of lakes'nore <br />property owners and may not represent everyone concerned, <br />-Does not want Ramsey County to control the park. <br />-Concerned with who will patrol the park and lake. <br />-Would like to see D.N,R. exercise greater control over <br />the lake. <br />-Residents have done a good job of policing themselves <br />on the lake. <br />-The ~;~aximum number oz boats 'allo~~led on lake should be <br />determined. <br />