Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />:• i <br />MINUTES t)F ~ P ${'~ MEETING .. f9CTCBER 6e 1965 <br />The following members were presents Fes Hagemeyer9 Lawrence Haglund, Arlyn Gunderman~ <br />Donald Weisman9 Ra.chard Hansen and Thomas Morriss. <br />.~1so present were Perry Copeland, V3,11age .Attorney <br />and Robert 5chaef®r, Village Manager, <br />PRCCEDU.RE FC~R $C,~ SITIC~N CF TEND FROM COIINCIFMAN' <br />Correspondence from the Village Manager requesting certain information from the Village <br />Attorn®y and ha.s reply was da.stributed to the membersQ The fo11ow3.ng is the letter d3r~ <br />acted to the attorney and the .Attorneys reply.s <br />(Fetter to N~°s Copeland) .. The following is an excerpt from the minutes of the Park Board <br />meeting held on September lst, The board requests that you supply as much infoi~nation as <br />you can come up with on the various questions,. This information is needed-as soon as pos- <br />sible as the date for the next meeting cannot be determined until .t is received® <br />1, In case of a condemnation awards how is the award made (lump sum or may payments be <br />made over a period of years) and generally' what is the tax impact upon recipients of a <br />condemnation award2 Is the recipient required. to make payments on mone'g'received as taxm <br />able income? <br />2, Is it possible to develop a program of planned condemnation through planned acquisi~ <br />tionsy such as 10 acres per year for the next 10 1.5 years, depending on the total amount <br />of-land owned by an individual? <br />3. Can the owner of a parcel of land settle for less than the amount awarded by the Cc~ <br />missioners in condemnation proceedings? <br />~., .Is them any way in which condemnation awards may be programed over,a period of years3 <br />Otter from N~°, .Copelaftad) ~- I write in response to your letter of September 3, 1965, <br />wherein you pose several q~estiosas regarding condemnation of lands for park purposes, <br />1, The award is made by the commissioners calling for full pagment in cash, The recip- <br />ient pays income taxes on arXy profit he may realize from the sale, If he has owned the <br />property for more than 6 months he may qualify fdr long-term capital gain treatment and <br />this limits his federal income tax liability to 25~ of the profit, <br />20 .The Village legally could acquire a given amount of land each year for several years, <br />but there is no way to tie the land up for the. taking in the future, so there would be <br />no assurance that the program could be fulfilled as planned, <br />3. Yes® <br />/~, Yes9 but na way to program them so as to assure that the land will. not be sold in <br />the interim from the first to subsequent acquisitions, <br />It appears that the desire of the park board is just touched upon in the above questions. <br />I think I understand what they are trying to accomplish, and the subject is an involved <br />one with many considerations, I think I can do abetter job of advising them.. by attending <br />their meeting and discussing the entire problem, <br />Nxr, Copeland discussed with the Park Board the matters to be concerned in purchasing prop® <br />arty from a member of the Council, Pgr..Copelandts remarks were based on three premises, <br />la ~ portion of the park plan involves acquisition of property owned by a member of the <br />Village Council, <br />2, .~irzds are not available to make an outright purchase, <br />3, The acquisition of this property does not contemplate immediate us®, <br />~As a generality the Council cannot enter into a contract with a member of its group, <br />There are exceptions to this rule, but they .could not be applied in the case under con <br />sideration, <br />There is a single method for obtaining property from a Councilman and that method is con <br />demnationo ~Srd.Copeland outlined in general terms the normal condemnation procedure, <br />.&fter discu..ssing the matter of obtaining the Councilman°s property through a contrac°~~neg~ <br />