Laserfiche WebLink
-6- <br />or other wildlife considerations, All park developments, without exception, <br />are planned for areas now in a disturbed condition. Some are excavated and <br />abandoned borrow pits from which sand and gravel was removed and no <br />rehabilitation applied. The remainder is former agricultural land, in large <br />part rhubarb plantings from an earlier farmer. These fields are almost wholly <br />covered with the rhubarb plants and an invasion of brome grass, neither of <br />which hold wildlife habitat value of consequence as nesting or as food species. <br />NEW BRIGHTON PAYMENT <br />In its request for repayment, New Brighton has detailed its cost in four areas, <br />summed up as: <br />Initial Purchase Costs $651,541 <br />Interest Costs & Date 394,672 <br />Future Interest Costs 146,849 <br />Stewardship Costs 46,560 <br />$1,237,622 <br />Staff can recommend the first and fourti~ line items of the summary for re- <br />imbursement to New Brighton, They represent comparable payments of those made <br />to Eden Prairie in the Anderson Lakes transfer and are documented costs to the <br />city. <br />Staff can as readily recommend a ag inst the third line item, "Future Interest <br />• Costs." Given that the City will receive its money as usable cash, it could <br />.choose to negate the costs in several ways, including investment at presently <br />much higher interest levels than 1967 and 1.969 bonds bear. <br />The remaining item, interest costs to date, are clearly expenses to~the city in <br />the acouistion of parkland. The rationale which determined the share of-the <br />funds which this parcel carries is probably correct. However, Council Policy <br />(PP/DG for ROS) states as allowable reimbursements: <br />"In certain situations, it may be mutually desirable to transfer the <br />ownership of regional recreation open space from one implementing agency to <br />'another. In these cases, the agency that initially acquired the land <br />should be reimbursed fom its actual local-fund capital investment. This <br />should be acomplished through an acquisition grant from the Metropolitan <br />Council. <br />°'U se of Council grant funds is limited to the costs of acquisition and <br />development of regional recreation open space. Grants for acquisition pay <br />for the cost of real estate, relocation assistance, utility assessments, <br />land stewardship, and legal fees and appraisals done by other than e <br />implementing agency staff. Once land is acquired but prior to park <br />development, the land may be used to "caretake°' the investment in buildings <br />or for agricultural use. In other cases, efforts to clean up and restore <br />the natural landscape begin. This includes fencing and removing buildings, <br />foundations, old roads, etc. These initial land stewardship costs are <br />eligible for Council .acquisition grants. Revenue raised by the <br />implementing agencies from interim uses is also used for. these grant- ~> <br />eligible stewardship costs. <br />