My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 03-27-2007
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2007
>
CCP 03-27-2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2007 3:53:58 PM
Creation date
3/23/2007 2:58:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
money marketing the sites and will prefer exclusive rights to the property. He added that the sale <br />of the land is just ane step of the entire process; there are many steps required in order to get the <br />most revenue out of the development. <br />Delaune asked staff to explain why some developers have been telling us that the location is <br />wonderful, yet so few developers have shown interest in the development. Black suggested that <br />the City is looking for a particular type of use and the office market is still somewhat soft. If the <br />City chooses to offer small office or warehouse sites instead, there would be substantially more <br />interest. He stressed that we only need one developer and tenant to make a project possible, <br />however he acknowledged that it would be better if there was more competition for the site. <br />Pro~erty Acquisitions <br />Black reported that the Postal Service has hired local architects to design the interior of the new <br />retail space; the developers have their own architects to design the exterior. Kaufhold inquired if <br />the City owns the land that the retail site will be built on. Black replied that the City owns the <br />land to the south of Dalco where the annex building will be built, and Ryan will purchase that <br />property; Pratt Ordway already owns the retail site. Kaufhold stated that he is concerned with <br />the cost of the development and wants this to be a profitable development. He inquired where <br />the money will came from to help pay the difference between the new site and the old site. <br />Black replied that there are three cost factors: the actual cost to move the post office operations, <br />the buildout, and the differential on the lease. While exact figures are not known, these costs <br />• could be up to $3.1 million. He added that there are benefits to be considered that the City will <br />be receiving for this move: the Northwest Quadrant would most likely not advance if the post <br />office is not moved, new residential and commercial developments do not want to go into an area <br />with older decaying buildings, and the City will receive a higher tax return for the site and the <br />new tax revenues from the new retail and annex buildings. It may not completely add up in the <br />long run, but the City will have a new vibrant development. <br />Flahave inquired if the TIF District 26 is being rolled into the TIF for the Northwest Quadrant. <br />Black replied that the City cannot roll the districts together; there is the possibility of using the <br />surplus increment from TIF 26 to help offset some the costs in the Northwest Quadrant; however <br />it would require special legislative approval. Sculthorp inquired if those funds are included in <br />the $10 million that is being rolled into the development. Black replied that it would be used to <br />help offset deficit costs and is not included in the $10 million. Larson added that it can not be <br />included unless the state gives approval; at this point there is nothing from TIF District 26 <br />included in cash flow analysis. <br />Nelson asked where in the eminent domain process is for the post office and when it will move. <br />Black replied that values are still to be determined and they plan on moving by the end of the <br />year. <br />Kaufhold inquired to the benefits of Ryan being the developer and not the City. Black replied <br />that the City is not a developer, there are too many risks involved for the City, and the City <br />would lose any tax revenues from the property. Kaufhold stated that he is looking for a way to <br />justify a $39.00 per square foot lease. Black replied that though the tenant improvements could <br />be as high as $39.00 per square foot, they most likely won't be that high. Larson added that that <br />rate wvuld not be for the whole project, but only far the retail space, which is roughly 1900 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.