My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 06-02-1982
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1982
>
PRECM 06-02-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 2:35:22 AM
Creation date
3/28/2007 12:26:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 2, 1982 Park Board Minutes Page 2 <br />Gunderman asked if the CIP in:~ormation could be included • <br />with the minutes or agenda. <br />Anderson said yes, with the ar~enda. <br />Johnson asked if the Park Board should look at the Comprehensive <br />Plan at the same time. <br />Anderson said yes, the Counci~_ will be considering it June 22. <br />B. Update Long Lake Park <br />1lndcrsc~n said he cJ,tvct •t.hc> m<;~nngcr a cony of t.r-c u};x1r.~t.c he wrote <br />lc~ uc~ :i.a~c: 1 uc;lf~c1 ;i n the C'i t: y 11.1.1 1. Nc'w.c li~~ rE'.r' . nnd~~.r. son h,~nded <br />out information from Mel Council staff, Ramsey County staff <br />(commentary before they approved the plan). Also a letter <br />from C. Dayton on EIS and things he wants the city to do. <br />Gunderman said that the way it looks Met Council can't do <br />~~nylha.nq. <br />'Anderson said that's correct from Dayton's point of view. <br />Anderson said it may not hurt for people to call the Parks and. <br />Open Space people and ask them to continue moving on this <br />the ro ert title can't <br />process. If they hold back on action, p p y <br />change hands. That means the city doesn't get that money in <br />interest. It's a good hunk o'. money, About $300 a day. The <br />EIS question is not going to be resolved for about six months. <br />Tf the EI5 is ordered, it will be about a year. In that period <br />of time we would lose about $'50,000. Think it is important to <br />get Met Council to move. Their current intention is to make <br />approval on June 24th. <br />Gunderman asked what their pleasure was. <br />Dahl said it makes sense to call. Will call those she called <br />before. <br />Anderson said that calling a few people from Met Council would <br />be enough. Just want them to know we are still kicking. <br />Van Hatten suggested sending a letter. <br />Dahl felt a personal call is :_a mop°e effective. <br />Gunderman asked what are Dayton's legal chances. <br />VI, <br />Anderson said .none. The state law Dayton cites has never been <br />written up. The law cannot be enforced unless the rules and <br />regulations are written. Att+arney .for Met Council said it <br />doesn't hold water and a staff person said the same.. =- <br />Old Business <br />None <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.