My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 05-04-1983
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1983
>
PRECA 05-04-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 2:26:50 AM
Creation date
3/28/2007 2:40:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~~~~ ~~ ~~ A publlcatlon for subscribers to the APA Planning Advisory Se~ ice <br />January 1983 83-1 <br />Tax Increment Financing <br />By Sam Casella <br />There is a striking similarity bet~+•een the questions cities <br />are asking about tax increment financing (T1F) and the <br />.questions that s•ndicated advice columnist Ann Landers <br />regu]arh• receives about adolescent sex. To wit: Shouldl <br />do it? l^.'here do l do it? Hoc do I do it? And, what are the <br />consequences if I do it? <br />Before ans++•ering these questions, as they pertain to TIF, <br />let's first revie~+• with athree-part definition of TIF. It is: <br />• A method of capturing the tax revenue that results <br />from private redevelopment projects; <br />• A trust fund that collects those increased revenues and <br />allocates them to such public purposes as land ac- <br />quisition and parking facilities; and <br />• A spur to private investment to start the cycle and <br />keep it going. ' <br />Diagrammatically, asimplified flow of TIF cash can be <br />found in Figure L <br />In effect; TIF is a bootstrap method.of using private <br />Sam' Casella, AICP, is the executive director of the <br />Clearwater Downtown Development Board, Clearwater,. <br />Florida. A similar version of this article appeared in the <br />January 1983 issue of Center City Report, t+~hich is pub- <br />lished monthly by the International Do++•ntown Executives <br />Association. <br />~~ <br />Private <br />a Redevelopment <br />// - Projects <br />Public Redevelopment Increased Tax <br />Expenditures Base <br />Trust Fund <br />Revenue <br />Figure 1. The TIF Cycle <br />redevelopment to support public redevelopment, thereby <br />making more private investment possible. The beauty, to <br />the taxpayer, is that there are no increased property taxes. ate. <br />This particularly appeals to homeowners and suburbanites w- <br />who often don't care to have their taxes flowing into .~_ <br />downtown redevelopment projects. ~.. <br />94w*- <br />Should I Do It? <br />A chicken and a pig were strolling by a diner one mor- <br />ning. The chicken smiled and said, "Doesn't that'make you <br />feel proud that we are responsible for enabling those <br />humans to enjoy their breakfast?" The pig replied, 'That's <br />easy for you to say. For you it's merely a contribution, for <br />me it's a total commitment." <br />Cities that expect to use tax increment financing suc- <br />cessfully wiIihave to be like the pig and make atotal com- <br />mitment. It would be a mistake.to think that TIF is a new <br />panacea that relieves everyone of responsibility while it <br />produces cash windfalls. <br />Underscoring the need for a local commitment is the fact <br />that, typically, TIF yields very meager returns in the ear- <br />ly. years. A public redevelopment agency will need to in- <br />-,~_ ~_~ <br />. ~ _ <br />j Y <br /> <br /> <br />`~,:; <br />Americ~:n R(~nning Association, 1313 E. 60th St., Chicago, tL 60637; 312-955.-9100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.