My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 02-xx-1983
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1983
>
PRECA 02-xx-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2007 2:25:39 AM
Creation date
3/28/2007 2:50:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 25,-1983 <br />~~ <br />r~A N 2 6 1983 <br />/G ~ <br />~ ~ . 1 ~. <br />r' <br />To: James W. Fornell, City Manager *)~' <br />From:. Maurice H. Anders~~rector of Parks and Recreation <br />Re: 1983 Summer Programming <br />The Park Board had recommended and the Council concurred <br />in approving the development of a cooperative summer school <br />program .for New Brighton residents. This concept was pro- <br />.posed by the Mounds View Community Education Department <br />and details were to be worked out by the staff of the <br />affected agencies.. <br />The program as envisioned included the following elements: <br />1) Provision of facilities and basic educational <br />classes by school district (paid by summer <br />school tax levy.) <br />2) Recreation/Enrichment classes offered by the <br />Park and Recreation Departments (fee supported) <br />3) Provision of transportation by School District <br />4) Joint publicity by cities and School District <br />5) Joint registration by cities and School District <br />Benefits of the program: <br />1) Reduced fees (50$ on average) to participants <br />in recreation classes because of lower instructor <br />rates <br />2) Slightly reduced promotional and administration <br />costs <br />3) More appropriate distinction of municipal and <br />district program responsibilities <br />This program was presented to a group of Mounds View ~ <br />teachers last week. The teachers were strongly opposed <br />to the program stating that fees charged by the district <br />are legitimate and that teachers are best qualified to <br />instruct these classes. The group advised the Community <br />Education Director that their union would oppose formation q <br />of this program. As a result, the Community Education <br />Department has abandoned the effort, at least for 1983. <br />Our department is offering an alternative to the district's <br />summer program. We will only offer recreational classes <br />staffed with qualified instructors and coordinated in such <br />a way that residents could send their children to the edu- <br />cational classes offered by the district and to our recrea- <br />tional classes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.