My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 12-07-1983
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1983
>
PRECM 12-07-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 3:01:05 AM
Creation date
3/29/2007 1:49:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 7, 1983 Park Board Minutes <br />Gunderman expressed concern with cost. <br />Anderson said the only increase over 1982 <br />be an inflationary one. Unless we decide <br />the agreement, then there is less cost to <br />Dahl asked whether the Police and Fire see <br />in the agreement. <br />Anderson said if the services change, the <br />Agreement would have to be changed. <br />Page 6 <br />projections will <br />we want out of <br />the City. <br />~tion would stay <br />Joint Powers <br />Johnson asked if either side wanted to renegotiate? <br />Anderson said the City staff doesn't and does not think the <br />County staff does either. No changes are recommended. <br />John Schultz asked if there was an ending date for the <br />agreement. <br />Johnson said all that was needed was a date by which it <br />must be renegotiated. <br />MOTION BY DAF?L, SECONDED BY OLSON, THAT THE JOINT POWERS <br />AGREEMENT BE EXTENDED FOR 5 YEARS BEYOND THE PRESENT DATE,. <br />MOTION PASSED. <br />John Schultz said there is a difference between an ad hoc policing <br />situation and policing on a regular basis, whoever-gets <br />there first is responsible for the costa <br />Anderson said we have agreed to put on a part time, non-sworn <br />in officer. We have a regular patrol of the area since it <br />has been owned. It's not a new cost a There is no expectation <br />that the .figures are wrong. <br />Joann Knuth asked. if increase in park use had been worked in the <br />policing figures. <br />Anderson said yes, it has been anticipated. <br />Johnson explained to Schultz that the date is a requirement <br />by law. <br />Schultz agreed but said it is inforceable too. <br />Anderson said if the LLAC votes differently, say for 3 years, <br />it will go to the County Board with New Brighton Park Board's <br />motion for 5 years and the County Board will decide,' <br />Joann Knuth added that the Police. Department has been doing <br />a good job responding to things. in the park, expecially in <br />the last year. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.