My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 09-07-1983
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1983
>
PRECM 09-07-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:59:19 AM
Creation date
3/29/2007 1:57:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Meeting of August 17, 1983 <br />Page 2 <br />4. Discussion questions were addressed by Bowen and Simons. Bowen responded <br />to a question as to the benefits of prairie restoration by suggesting that <br />this was a low-cost planting system, providing good habitat for song birds, <br />teal, etc., bringing in new and interesting bugs, and providing excellent <br />interpretative and historical value. Additionally, there is little need <br />for watering prairie areas, saving on maintenance costs. Anderson asked <br />what was on the site riow. Bowen suggested probably weeds, non-native <br />plants most likely from Europe and Africa. His company would plant (in <br />seed) 4-5 grasses and,8-10;flowers:,with an additional 25 species as <br />small plants. The remaining species would have to be acquired elsewhere. <br />Cammers says reactions of the neighbors would depend on how the plan is <br />presented. Bowen suggested several areas which his company have restored <br />which could be viewed by interested and/or concerned residents. These <br />include-Bunker Hills, Girl Scout building on Robert Street. south of the <br />river, Brookdale Library, East Bethel, Cedar Creek. <br />' Schultz asked-where in the schedule this planting would fit. Simons <br />said probably this coming year. There is $10,000 in the plan for a <br />nature interpretative area, which would be adequate.. Ongoing burns would <br />cost approximately $400 each. Schultz suggested pictures be taken of the <br />areas as they look now. <br />5. Simons gave the Board an update of Long Lake park activities. Hopefully <br />they will break ground by the end of the month. Bids should come in during <br />the winter for prairie restoration. Regarding the Williams Pipeline <br />problem, information has surfaced that. the railroad easement to Williams <br />states that if the railroad wants to use the land, the pipeline would have <br />to be moved at Williams' expense. This might have positive implications <br />for the park site. The Countyengineer is working on drainage under the <br />tracks. Although we are somewhat behind this year, development should. <br />catch up during 1984. The building should be bid over winter, with <br />construction expected in spring of 1984. By 1985, the park should be open <br />to the public, including the beach. The old beach site will need to be <br />used during the summer of 1984. <br />6. The next meeting of the Long Lake Regional Park Advisory Board will be <br />on Wednesday, September 21. A possible discussion topic will be <br />park management and use ordinances.. There was some question about the <br />meeting start time of 8:d0. If there is strong feeling that a different <br />time would be better, please convey your opinion to John Schultz. <br />7. The meeting was adjourned by chairman Schultz at 9:20 p.m. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.