Laserfiche WebLink
~ .~ <br />'~r~ <br />• ' <br />--t ~,.; <br />~~~~~~ Eii ~ A publication for subscribers to the APA Planning Advisory Service <br />January 1983 83-I <br />Tax Increment Financing <br />By Sam Casella <br />There is a striking similarity betvt•een the questions cities <br />are asking about tax increment financing (TIF) and the <br />questions that s}~ndicated advice columnist Ann Landers <br />regularly receives about adolescent sex. To v`~it; Should I <br />do it? t~'here do I do it? How do I do it? And, what are the <br />consequences if I do it? <br />Before ans«•ering these questions, as they pertain to TIF, <br />let's first revietir with athree-part definition of TIF. It is: <br />• A method of capturing the tax revenue that results <br />from private redevelopment projects; <br />• A trust fund that collects those increased revenues and <br />allocates them to such public purposes as land ac- <br />quisition and parking facilities; and <br />• A spur to private investment to start the cycle and <br />keep it going. . <br />Diagrammatically, asimplified flow of TIF cash can be <br />found in Figure 1. <br />In effect, TIF is a bootstrap method of using private <br />Sam Casella, AICP, is the executive director of the <br />Clearwater Downtown Development Board, Clearwater, <br />Florida. A similar version of this article appeared in the <br />January 1983 issue of Center City Report, v.~hich is pub- <br />lished monthly by the International Downtown Executives <br />Association. <br />s <br />` ~ S <br />YJ~ jjjjj <br />.,a ,,- <br />~i ~ . <br />. ~ <br />~, <br />~~ <br />~ ~ <br />'3 .~ I <br />r <br />L _~ ~~_ <br /> Private <br />a Redevelopment \ <br />/ - Projects \~j <br />Pubiic Redevelopment Increased Tax <br />Expenditures Base <br />Trust Fund <br /> Revenue <br />Figure 1. The. TIF Cycle <br />redevelopment to support public redevelopment, thereby <br />making more-private investment possible. The beauty, to <br />the taxpayer, is that there are no increased property taxes. <br />This particularly appeals to homeowners and suburbanites <br />who often don't care to have their taxes flowing into <br />do~~~ntown redevelopment projects. <br />Should I Do It? <br />A chicken and a pig were strolling by a diner one mor- <br />ning. The chicken smiled and said, "Doesn't that'make you <br />feel proud that we are responsible for enabling those <br />humans to enjoy their breakfast?" The pig replied, 'That's <br />easy for you to say. For you it's merely a contribution, for <br />me it's a total commitment." <br />Cities that expect to use tax increment financing suc- <br />cessfully wil]have to be like the pig and make a total com- <br />mitment. Itwould be amistake to think that TIF is a new <br />panacea that relieves everyone of responsibility while it <br />produces cash windfalls. <br />Underscoring the need fora local commitment is the fact <br />that, typically, TIF yields very meager returns in the ear- <br />ly years. A public redevelopment agency will need to in- <br />;~~' <br />f <br />~~ _ <br />C I ~~~25 s?s;€3 .~`~ ~ <br />~'! <br />~~:. <br />American Planning Association, 1313 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637; 312='955-9100 <br />