My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 03-02-1983
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1983
>
PRECM 03-02-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:58:11 AM
Creation date
3/29/2007 2:05:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.NEW BRIGHTQN PARK BOARD. <br />MIDTUTES <br />MP_RCH: 2 ~ 19 8 3 <br />.,+ <br />I. The meeting was called to-order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairperson <br />Gunderman <br />II. All members were present. <br />III. The minutes of the January 5, 1983 meeting were approved as submitted. <br />IV. Councilman Blomquist gave the Council Report, <br />V. New Business <br />A. Hansen Play Area Development <br />Maleah Massett, Landscape Archi, ect, described the planning <br />process used to design the play area at Hansen Park. <br />Anderson explained that the equipment planned for the. area <br />would be mostly of wood construction and similar to equipment <br />recently installed at other New Brighton Parks. He further <br />stated that most of the equipment would be installed during <br />the summer of 1983. <br />Jackie Mullaney, 593 17th Ave. was present and made. the <br />following observations <br />-she talked to many of her neighbors and they are very <br />pleased to see the project in progress <br />-concern was expressed that the basketball court be built. <br />on stable ground <br />-several area residents had called and expressed strong <br />support-for. the basketball court <br />B. Draft Resolution Regarding Use of Long Lake-Park Funds <br />Dave-Van Hatten questioned why the Park Board's request that <br />money. be added to the fund on a yearly-basis had not been in-- <br />corporated into the resolution, .Anderson replied that s aff <br />felt, that while the idea was admirable, it wasn't likely that <br />excess funds would be available. <br />Ken Johnson suggested that a unanimous vote of the Council be <br />required to reduce the principal. Roger Blomquist suggested <br />that a strong majority be required. E11en Dahl suggested that <br />a strong majority and review by the Park .Board be required. <br />Motion by Van Hatten, seconded by Johnson recommending that <br />the first whereas of the resolution be amended to include <br />language requiring a 4/5 vote of the Council to reduce the <br />principal.... <br />Lotion by Dahl, seconded by Johnson, to amend the motion to <br />include a review by, the Park Board if a decision is made~-to <br />reduce the prncieal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.