Laserfiche WebLink
.,,•~;R <br /> <br />11 <br />The intent seems plain. Some m~nicipalfties have .stated that their access to <br />master plans has come only after the agency has adopted the plan, making subs <br />tantive change to meet their concerns improbable. If this has happened, it is <br />not consistent with policy. <br />From another point of view, some implementing agencies cite cases in which <br />municipalities have delayed plan approval unduly in some cases insisting upon. <br />conditions which worK against the agency or the regional interest. Some imple- <br />menting agencies have been prevented from installing needed improvements, even. <br />developments for which. the municipalities had given earlier concept approval. <br />There are differences in the laws which control implementing agencies from one <br />Jurisdiction to another and some of these have, on occasion, blocked en <br />implementing agency from going ahead with regional protects, <br />One maJor effect. some municipalities have exerted upon regional open ..space has <br />been special assessments levied against parks. The Council, the commission and <br />some of the implementing agencies have stated increasing concern over the pro- <br />cess by which municipalities have made special assessments against regional <br />parkland,-questioning if they were based-upon actual benefits to the park. <br />Other concerns are about how assessments should be paid and when. they should <br />be set. <br />One. remedy suggested is that the municipality and the implementing agency <br />could agree to treat the master plan as a conditional use permit, possibly. <br />meeting at once concerns on the part of the municipalities, the implementing <br />agency and the Council about the current planning process. <br />Related Questions: <br />1. How much control over regional park. development should municipalities <br />have? What happens if more than one municipality is involved? <br />2. Are the problems. real and large enough to be worth bothering about? <br />3. If an implementing agency and municipality agreed to treat a regional park <br />master plan for development as a conditional use permit, would. it help <br />resolve the problems cited? <br />4. Is there a simpler and, therefore, better way to deal with the concerns? <br />5. What are the."pluses and minuses" to a municipality from a regional park <br />located within or adtacent to its boundaries? <br />ISSUE 12. How much leadership does or should the Council's recreation o en <br />space program prov a ~n a area o a rma eve ac ion an m~nor~ y usiness <br />enzer~rises <br />Currently, the policy plan for recreation open s-pace does not address this <br />issue.. <br />In its recent contracts, the Council (May 1983) has inserted language as <br />follows: <br />• The Council shall not discriminate...on the basis of race, color, creed, <br />religion., national origin, sex, affectional or sexual preference, age, <br />political affiliate, marital status, or status .with regard to public <br />