Laserfiche WebLink
14 <br />Two arguments against -freeing up interim revenue use are: <br />- Policy should-not endorse management which is aimed at generating maximum <br />wvtnue over a prolonged period. That is not the purpose for which the <br />Land was acquired. <br />- Interim uses could be viewed by surrounding municipalities as a source of <br />tax revenues. land put into recreation open space has been removed fran <br />tax ro11s fora public use. If it is used as a revenue generator by other <br />use for sane extended time, the municipality from which the land was <br />re~nRved might. feel it has a supportable claim. <br />Related Questions: <br />1. What limits, if any, are appropriate to place on generation and expendi- <br />t~res of revenues Earned Fran non-recreation activity in regional recrea- <br />tion open space? <br />2. Is generation of revenue a reasonable use of part of a regional park if it <br />.supports recreation services elsewhere? <br /> <br /> <br />SA2082-PI~i0PN1 <br />5.30.$4 _ <br /> <br />