Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 2 <br />QUESTIONS CONTINUED.) <br />- 5. If the-year 200.0 target for a completed system plan <br />reasonable?,.Appropriate? Feasible? <br />I~ .bb unneaQ~.b.t~.c xa even eon6•t,.den deve.Qapmenx o~ the <br />bdb~em camp~2e~te. <br />6. A major Council. teak has been attaining adequate fund <br />for the system. Should that teak tecome a formal goal <br />of the Council? What. is the appropriate task, exaclty? <br />Qb~Ga~.n~.ng ~und4 bhou.~d become a ~anma.~ gaa~2 0~ .the <br />C a un e,i..Z . <br />9 .The .State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) <br />is in revision and a similar national plan review (ORRC II) <br />may begin soon. Should the plan outline an increased role <br />for th8 regional and metropolitan system in a state and <br />national framework? What concerns need to be met? <br />P.~ann.~ng eb~anxb ~n a.2~ .there aneab 4hou.Cd be eaand.ina~ed <br />a6 much. ab pobb.;,b.~e. <br />$SUE 2 Is the system acquiring the right parks in the right plac <br />~L _ _~ ...~.,.. a.4...e~ ~...a , c , i- r,rnvi r7 ~ ncr the ricsht fac111tleS Wlthlri <br /> <br />-- ~ C11Clll: <br />Ueve~.apmen~ ha.b pnoeeeded boa 4~ow.Zy .and bhau.2d -be g~.ven <br />pn~.on~.~y avers aequ~.b~.x~.on. <br />ISSUE 4 Should there be a chap a in the scope of the regional system <br />or the Counci 's role. n a.mplement ni g the system? <br />,QUESTIONS <br />2. Would providing some special attractions in certain parks <br />encourage use or redistribute use to new parks? Would <br />that be desirable? <br />Suppan~t as deb.~nab~e. <br />ISSUE 5 What's needed .for regional operation and maintenance <br />'f'u'n ink ~olic~es7""'~ "-" <br />Policy 22 reads: <br />The regional recreation open space system should be analyzed. <br />and recommendations formulated to achieve equitable outdoor <br />recreation opportunities and consistent operating policies <br />throughout the Metropolitan Area financed by an adequate, <br />stable and equitable revenue source, <br />Sxnong.~y buppan~. <br />