Laserfiche WebLink
Page 4 <br />ISSUE 10 What's the status of local or municipal recreation open <br />space n the metr olitan svstem? What should the Council's involve- <br />QUESTIONS <br />3. Related to issue 11 as well as issue 10; should .there be <br />rewards to those communities which grant. consent to regional. <br />park acquisition and development within their jurisdiction.. <br />and, should there be penalties to those which do not? <br />A~ a m-i,n~.mum ~hene bhou.2d be netimbunbemen~ ~a mun~.e~.~a~2~.x~.e~ fan <br />aenv.~cea ~o neg~.ana.~ panh.a. <br />4~ <br />ISSUE 11 What is an appropriate level of municipal participation <br />aifd~o~r-3T"in £F~e'3evelopin`g reg~.oria recrea i n open space: sys em? <br />The 1974. parks act says that: <br />...(the implementing agency)...shall prepare, after consultation. <br />with, all affected municipalities, and submit...a master plan.. <br />The policy plan .uses similar language in policy 9: <br />Each implementing agency is responsible for preparing a master <br />plan for each regional system unit assigned to it by this policy <br />'plan. An implementing agency shall present the master plan to <br />affected local units of government and address their concerns <br />prior to submission to the Council. <br />The intent semms plain. Some municipalities have stated that <br />their access to master plans has come only after the. agency has <br />adopted the plan, making substantive change to meet their con- <br />cerns improbable. If this has happened, it is not consistent <br />with policy. <br />-From another point of view, some implementing agencies cite <br />- cases in which muncipalities-have delayed plan approval unduly <br />in some cases insisting upon conditions which work against the <br />agency or the regional interest.. Some implementing agencies <br />.have been prevented from installing needed .improvements, .even <br />developments for which the municipalities had given earlier <br />concept approval. There are differences in the laws which <br />control implementing agencies from on jurisdiction to another <br />and some of these have, on occasion, blocked an implementing <br />agency from going ahead with regional projects. <br />One major effect some municipalities have exerted upon regional <br />open space has been special assessments levied against parks. <br />The Council, the commission and some of .the implementing. agencies <br />have stated increasing concern over the process by which munici- <br />palities have made special assessments against regional parkland, <br />questing if they were based upon actual benefits to the park. <br />Other concerns are about how assessments should be paid and <br />when they should be set, <br />~ -0ne remedy suggested is that the municipality and the implementing <br />agency could agree to treat the master plan as a conditional use <br />permit, possibly meeting at once concerns on the part of the <br />muni.ci.palities~ the implementing agency and the Council about the <br />current planning process. <br />