My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 07-11-1984
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1984
>
PRECM 07-11-1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:53:28 AM
Creation date
3/29/2007 3:08:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br />ISSUE 10. What"s the status of local or municipal recreation open space in the <br />metropolitan system? what snou~a the counci~ s invoivemenz oe in itt <br />Working from municipal comprehensive plans, the Council has assembled data, and <br />will report on the condition of local recreation open space in terms of what <br />acreage is provided, in what categories, by planning areas (MDF zones). The <br />report will helpp to identify municipal recreation open space needs in the <br />region and should help in priority development for grant reviews. The report <br />will not be adequate to complete a comprehensive regional plan for local or <br />municipal recreation. needs. Much of what local recreation provides is in the <br />form of facilities, that is, built resources, necessary for active recreation. <br />That part of recreation-demand in the Region will require continuing~Council <br />-study to complete future reports. <br />Related Questions: <br />1. Is it appropriate and important for the Council to analyze and coordinate <br />local efforts in the metropolitan recreation system? Would it be helpful <br />to the region? <br />2. Would Council-offered technical assistance help communities do more <br />.effective long-range planning for recreation services? <br />3. Related to issue 11 as well as issue 10; should there be rewards to those <br />communities which grant consent to regional park acquisition and develop- <br />merit within their 3urisdiction and, conversely, should there be penalities <br />to those which do not? <br />4. Is it correct to state that municipalities more often need active recrea- <br />tion facilities rather than the recreation open .space which the regional <br />plan tends emphasize? How strongly is this true? How might the Council's <br />recreation open space plan change to help with problems? <br />5. Would it be helpful to local recreation agencies and their users if a <br />program were developed which coordinated the needs of local. agencies with <br />programs available in the regional recreation open space system? <br />ISSUE 11. What is an appropriate level of municipal participation and control.. <br />The 1974 parks act says that: <br />...(the implementing agency)...shall prepare, after consultation with all <br />affected .municipalities, and submit...a master plan. <br />The .policy plan uses similar language in policy 9: <br />- Each implementing agency is responsible for preparing a master plan for <br />each regional system unit assigned to it by this policy plan. An imple- <br />menting agency shall present the master plan to affected local. units of <br />government and addresss their concerns. prior to submission to the Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.