Laserfiche WebLink
13 <br />2. Should master plan preparation, as a matter of course, incorporate <br />preparation of an•EAW? <br />3. If yes, should it be prepared and circulated separately. or should it be <br />required as .part of a master plan, the contents of which are spelled out in <br />the policy plan? <br />ISSUE 14. To what extent should revenues from non-recreation use of <br />par an s e con ro e . <br />Tonal <br />Some implementing agencies have realized revenues from non-recreation activity <br />on land purchased-for regional parks. Most comes from continuing existing <br />uses. Agencies have collected agricultural land rent or crop shares. Some <br />have rented or leased buildings. A lesser amount-has come from sale of build- <br />ings and equipment. It"s important to remember that the .implementing agencies <br />are the owners and operators of the regional park. <br />According to the 1980 policy plan,. the implementing agencies are restricted to <br />using such revenue for costs which are grant eligible. Policy 20 states: <br />Grants to implementing agencies will be made for acquisition and <br />development as follows: <br />o Acquisition grants will include land costs, relocation assistance, <br />land stewardship, utility assessments and fees for services performed <br />by other than agency staff. <br />o Revenue from interim land uses will be used by the agency for grant- <br />eligible costs. <br />o Grants for development will include improvements within the regional <br />parks, park reserves or trail corridors of recreational facilities, <br />utilities, landscaping, roads and parking, building construction, and <br />maintenance facilities to serve the particular unit; as well as <br />natural resource rehabilitation within park reserves. <br />o System-wide improvements are grant-eligible.. When such eligible <br />system-wide facilities are also used for other than regional park <br />purposes, the regional funding will be on a negotiated prorated basis. <br />Barring plan change, if 0 & M grants become part of the regional program, <br />interim revenues could presumably support 0 & M. <br />The 1980 plan does not allow revenues from interim uses to be applied to <br />0 & M. Certain of the implementing agencies suggest that the plan mistakenly <br />assumed all regional parks were purchased undeveloped and that no recreation <br />use could occur until regional development grants are made. Interim management <br />of parks is confined to stewardship because no operation is believed to be <br />feasible in the undeveloped parks. In fact, several regional parks have been <br />put into service in the interim between acquisition and development, creating <br />operating costs which policy says cannot be supported by interim .revenues. The <br />agencies feel they should be permitted to use interim revenues to support <br />interim 0 & M costs. <br />