My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECM 07-11-1984
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
MINUTES
>
1984
>
PRECM 07-11-1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:53:28 AM
Creation date
3/29/2007 3:08:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 10 <br />ISSUE 10. What"s the status of local or municipal recreation~en space in the <br />me r~""ooTi'tan s 'stem. a sou a ounci'T's i nvo veT"'men~be i n i ii <br />Working from municipal comprehensive plans, the Council has assembled data, and <br />..will report on.the condition of local recreation open space in terms of what <br />acreage is provided, in what categories, by planning areas (MOF zones). The <br />report will help to identifymunicipal recreation open space needs in the <br />region and should help in priority development for grant reviews. The report <br />will not be adequate to complete a comprehensive regional plan .for local or <br />municipal recreation needs. Much of what local recreation provides is in the <br />form of facilities, that is, built resources, necessary for active recreation. <br />That part of recreation. demand in the Region will require continuing~Council <br />study to complete future reports. <br />Re]ated_Questions: <br />1. Is it appropriate and important for the Council to analyze and coordinate <br />local efforts in the metropolitan recreation system? Would it be helpful <br />to the region? <br />Would Council-offered technical assistance help communities do more <br />. effective long-range planning for recreation services? <br />. .Related to issue 11 as well as issue 10; should. there be rewards to those. <br />communities which grant consent to regional park acquisition and develop- <br />ment within their jurisdiction and, conversely, should there be penalfties <br />to those which do not? <br />4. Is it correct to state that municipalities more often need active-recrea- <br />tion facilities rather than the recreation open space which the regional <br />plan tends emphasize? How strongly is this true? How might the Council"s <br />recreation open space plan change to help with problems? <br />5. Would it be helpful to local recreation agencies and their users if a <br />program were developed which coordinated the needs of local agencies with <br />programs available in the regional recreation open space system? <br />ISSUE 11. What is an ap ropriate level of munici al articipation and control <br />w w w•.w ww ww rww ww•J rwwlAw9 rw/. r.l9 1AN Af1AA !K1/~0 !V! 0111 <br />The 1914 parks act says that: <br />...(the implementing agency)...sha11 prepare, after consultation with all <br />affected municipalities, and submit...a master plan. <br />The policy plan uses similar language in policy 9: <br />Each implementing agency is responsible for preparing a master plan for <br />each regional system unit assigned to it by this policy plan. An imple- <br />menting agency shall present the master plan to affected local units of <br />government and addresss their concerns prior to submission to the Council. <br />rl~~ • <br />~-~ <br />~~ ~~ <br />~ -- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.