My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 02-06-1985
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1985
>
PRECA 02-06-1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 2:38:58 AM
Creation date
3/30/2007 12:53:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 1, 19$5 <br />To: New Brighton Park Board <br />From: Maurice H, Anderson, Director of .Parks and Recreation <br />Re: February Park Board Agenda Items <br />Hedlund land purchase <br />The Council has directed staff and the ?ark Board to <br />examine the possibility of purchasing tYie westerly <br />portion of Mr. Hedlund`s property. As can be noted <br />from the attached, information this can be accomplished <br />without significant impact on the usability of Mr. Hedlund's <br />property. There are several different amounts of land that <br />could be examined, however, the most logical. would be cone <br />sider purchase of land west of the ditch. <br />The question the Board should .address is whether this <br />purchase would significantly benefit the park. <br />Advantage to Purchase <br />-Increase park size <br />-Improve, legitimatize access to xiver <br />-Future channel improvements might be less <br />complicated if city and county were "united" <br />Disadvantages <br />-Land in question is either steep bank or <br />under water <br />-Cost <br />-Increased liability <br />Staff does not recommend purchase regardless of the price. <br />Comp Plan Review <br />The city will review and revise its Comprehensive .Plan. in <br />1985,. The park position of that plan must also be revised <br />and the Park Board should .become involved in that process. <br />2 am recommending that the Board set a series of neighborhood <br />mtgs. to review park development and recreation program <br />development. I further recommend that the Board consider a <br />sub-committee to work on this project and possibly two or <br />three sub-committees to conduct the neighborhood meetings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.