My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PRECA 10-07-1992
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
Parks And Recreation
>
Minutes Park & Recreation Commission Meetings P&R 01200
>
AGENDAS
>
1992
>
PRECA 10-07-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2007 1:50:30 AM
Creation date
4/3/2007 3:32:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I~ <br />Resu/ts of ~5'Urvey to I~e~er~lne the. <br />sti~ <br />~ry <br />Impact of Trail Systems on the Community <br />Executive Summary <br />The results of the survey to determine what kind of impact public trails have had on <br />their respective communities are now in. They are somewhat surprising, although they <br />do tend to agree in many ways with the results of other surveys that were based on input <br />from residents in areas with community trail systems. This study surveyed one hundred <br />and forty-five communities in the states of Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota, South <br />Dakota and Wisconsin. The objective was to survey a census population of those people <br />responsible for implementing and maintaining trails. The respondents were primarily <br />Directors or Supervisors of Park and Recreation Departments. <br />The survey did not request detailed quantitative measurements, but simply asked how <br />trail areas compared to non-trail areas in regard to ten key citizen concerns. The. areas of <br />concern were Litter, Vandalism, Theft, pet Problems, Noise, Accidents, Trespassing, <br />Behavioral Problems, Aesthetics, and Property Valuations. Respondents selected one <br />of the following choices: Significantly Worse, Slightly Worse, theSame, Slightly Better, or <br />Significantly Better. One hundred and one communities responded, as of the writing of <br />this report, and eighty-three had trail systems, nine didn't and nine are planning for them. <br />.There were fifteen ratings given where trail areas were Significantly Worse. Twelve of <br />these were in regard to Pet Problems with one each for Litter, Noise and Aesthetics. <br />The rating of Slightly Worse showed up in all categories, but Pet Problems led with <br />thirty nine and was more than three times the runner up, Litter, which had twelve. Third <br />place was Behavior Problems, usually identified as people misusing the trails. <br />surprisingly, on the other side of the scale there were one hundred forty~ix ratings of <br />Significantly Better and two hundred and fifty three ratings of Slightly Better. Pet <br />Problems was, by far, the lowest recipient of either rating. The rating of Same was the <br />largest one in all categories, except Property Valnations,where it tied with Slightly <br />Better. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.