84-044 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

RESOLUTION NO. 84-44 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING PRELIMINARY PRD-38 AND PRELIMINARY PLAT PL-136. WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an application for preliminary PRD-38 and preliminary plat Pl-l36 was filed with the City of New Brighton on February 6, 1984. 2. That the Planning Commission. pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on the preliminary PRD-38 on March 28, 1984. All persons present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 3. That such application was reviewed by the City Council on April 10, 1984. 4. The written comments and analysis of the City Staff and the Planning Commission minutes and recommendation were considered. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the New Brighton City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to PRD-38 and PL-136. l. That the property is zoned R-l, Single Family Residential and R~2, Two Family Residential. 2, That the preliminary plat is consistent with the sub- division regulation contained in Chapter 26 of the City Code. 3. That the proposal is consistent with the stated purpose and principles of the PRO provisions as contained in Section 7-010. 4. That the PRO is consistent with the existing zoning and goals of the City Comprehensive Plan. 5. That the proposed development is compatible with the type, density and bulk of surrounding lands. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applications for PRD-38 and PL-l36 are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the association covenants and declarations be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. 2. That final PRD plans include a complete and dimensioned site and landscape plan and front, side and rear building elevations. 3. That the applicant develop a unit design which better reflects the high quality of development already existing adjacent to the site. 4. Inasmuch as the plans and design adverted to in paragraphs two and three above have not yet been presented to the Council and the suitability of the proposed development will depend upon the information contained in said plans and designs, the Council specifically reserves the right to refuse to grant PRD and final plat approval if it determines, in its sole discretion, that the final pro- posed landscaped plan, exterior design and materials, grading plan, and unit design do not provide adequate protection to the residential character of the adjacent property to the north of the subject property. Adop!~d--t1F~s~10th day of April ~ 1984. AT U S T : -;:~ --' ' ,,,.,...... "". -. ,. ~ ..,,-'- E g an, City C 1 e r k (SEAL)