1985-11-26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I Council Meeting Minutes November 26, 1985 Benke asked if the advisory group would be involved before or after approval of the PRO; Smith stated Housing Alliance does not see any changes to the drawings until after PRO approval, at which time input would be requested for the service package and design on individual units, and the neighborhood would be involved in the landscaping process which would proceed after approvals. Benke asked staff if an association might be a condition of a PRO; Winkels responded it could be added as a condition, but they are required in the final PRO requirements. Motion by Benke, seconded by Janecek, to waive the reading and adopt a RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND APPROVING PRELIMINARY PRD-44. I 3 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried In response to Benke's request, Mark Haggerty advised the audience that no credit from the City of New Brighton is being pledged for this project, 20% of the residents of the complex must be below 80% of the median income for this area, the complex must remain a rental piece of property and not converted to condominiums, and the program has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council for comments and has been submit- ted to the Minesota Housing Finance Agency for its comments. As there were no further comments or questions, Blomquist moved, seconded by Benke, to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. 3 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried Motion by Janecek, seconded by Blomquist, to WAIVE THE READING AND ADOPT A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR REVIEW (Park Place). 3 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried Bob Pierce, Lindberg Pierce, Inc., architects, reviewed changes to the city hall remodeling/addition project seeking consensus of the council of the plans and exterior. Dick Gilyard, Lindberg Pierce, Inc., reviewed model with options for east and west entrances. I In response to questions from councilmembers and staff, Gilyard and/or Lindberg explained only the east entrance would be covered because that entrance receives the most traffic, stone would be preferred for the entrances but they are considering brick, stucco, and wood, and that it would be difficult to extend the vault over the west entrance because of the inside-to-outside condition. Page Four City Ha 11 Renovation/ Addition