1985-09-24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I I I Council Meeting Minutes September 24, 1985 Public Hearing, continuation Krueger reviewed staff report, stating the applicant is requesting a subdivision for a portion of Lowy Enterprises; the subdivision of this property, which is registered as torrance, will enable the applicant to purchase the property and include it in the approved PUD for Rush Lake Business Park. Krueger also indicated that the applicant will be asking approval of the final plat of Lot 1, Block 1, of Rush Lake First Addition, which is in place of the proposed subdivision, which will enable the applicant to meet the objectives of the Development Agreement and commence construction this Fall. Krueger indicated this is an in- terim step as the applicant is unable to finalize the entire plat prior to construction season of this year, Krueger has discussed the various steps with the City Attorney; they feel it is a way the developer can get the land platted, receive legal descriptions for the parcels for the first building, and begin construction this year. Krueger also asked council to review the proposed curb cuts for the PUD to determine whether or not their objectives have been met. Dennis Johnson, attorney for the applicant, reviewed diagrams of the plats. Krueger stated that approval of the final plat would be by simple motion, and recommended that such action be taken subject to approval of the City Engineer and subject to the combination of several of the parcels (B, C, and E) for tax purposes with Ramsey County prior to the signing of the final plat that the applicant will be proposing. Benke asked if those conditions were acceptable to the developer; Johnson responded affirmatively. Krueger pOinted out that the final plat is different from the prelim- inary plat, but is consistent with the PUD approval and with the Development Agreement. Johnson stated their goal is to create one independent identifiable legal for the first building as soon as possible; may have to require another registered land survey if another subdivision is used. LeFevere stated his concern was a planning concern that the residue lots be combined with the large one so that they will be identifiable and would not be landlocked. As there was no further discussion, Harcus moved, seconded by Schmidt to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. , , 5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried Page Two Public Hearing Minor Subdivi- sion - Taylor Report 85-275 Res. 85-106 7:41-7:49p.m.