My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-04-09
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1985
>
1985-04-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2005 5:21:37 AM
Creation date
8/11/2005 12:05:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Cou nc il t.1i nu te s <br />April 9, 1985 <br /> <br />Consent Agenda. continued <br /> <br />5. Consideration of setting a public hearing date on April 23. <br />1985, at 7:35 p.m.. to consider a minor subdivision (Vivian <br />Cummings). <br /> <br />6. Consideration of setting a public hearing date on April 23, <br />1985, at 7:35 p.m. to consider a minor subdivision (Edwin <br />Taylor) . <br /> <br />7. Consideration of setting a public hearing date on May 14. <br />1985. at 7:30 p.m., to consider modification of Development <br />District #1 for creation of Tax Increment District #7. <br /> <br />8. Consideration of Street Sweeping Agreement with the City of <br />Arden Hills. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes, t~otion Carried <br /> <br />Counci 1 Bus i ness <br /> <br />Winkels reviewed the staff report concerning an amendment to Ordinance <br />Section 4-580. Setback Exemptions; Section 2-620. Definition of <br />Structure; and Section 2-621. Definition of Principal Structure. He <br />stated the ordinance is an attempt to clarify the zoning code in <br />regard to decks. Mr. Winkels reminded the Council that a few <br />months ago a situation arose regarding a deck and this ordinance <br />will clarify what the setbacks are. This ordinance amendment does <br />in fact make it clear that decks are subject to the district setback <br />requirements which have always applied in this city. The ordinance <br />itself has been reviewed by the Planning Commission and they are in <br />full agreement with the recommendation. <br /> <br />Harcus stated that it seems to improve the current ordinance and <br />he was Council Representative on the Planning Commission when the <br />problem with the deck came to light and he feels the only way we <br />are going to find out how the ordinance will work is when the first <br />request is processed. <br /> <br />Winkels felt there never seemed to be a problem with the existing <br />ordinance but feels this amendment will definitely improve it. <br /> <br />Motion by Harcus. seconded by Blomquist. to WAIVE THE READING AND <br />HOLD THE FIRST READING OF ORDINANCES At1ENDING SECTION 2-620. SECTION <br />2-621 AND SECTION 4-580 OF THE NEW BRIGHTON CITY CODE. <br /> <br />4 Ayes - 0 Nayes. Motion Carried <br /> <br />Page Two <br /> <br />Set Public Hearing <br />Vivian Cummings <br />Report 85-89 <br /> <br />Set Public Hearing <br />Edwin Taylor <br />R~port 85-90 <br /> <br />Set Public Hearing <br />Modification Of <br />Development Dist. <br />#1 - Tax Incremen <br />District #7 <br />Report 85-91 <br /> <br />Street Sweeping <br />Agreement <br />Arden Hills <br />Report 85-92 <br /> <br />Council Bus i ness <br /> <br />Ordinance Amend- <br />ments <br />First Reading <br />Section 4-580, <br />Section 2-620 <br />Section 2-621 <br />Report 85-93 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.