Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Counei 1 Mi nutes <br />February 28, 1984 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Krueger verified Schmidt's statement that this <br />amendment is addressing the issue for new develop- <br />ments when application are made. <br /> <br />Benke stated that nothing under current construction <br />is against the proposed amendment. <br /> <br />Motion by Janecek, seconded by Schmidt, to WAIVE THE <br />READING AND HOLD THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE <br />AMENDING SECTION 7-060 OF THE NEW BRIGHTON ZONING <br />CODE PERTAINING to PARKING REQUIREMENTS IN PLANNED <br />RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Motion by Blomquist, seconded by Schmidt, to CALL A <br />WORK SESSION ON MARCH 27, 1984 AT 7:00 P.M. FOR <br />PURPOSE OF MEETING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO <br />DISCUSS THE HOME OCCUPATION ORDINANCE. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Motion by Benke, seconded by Schmi dt, to RECONSIDER <br />THE ACTION TAKEN ON THE NAME CHANGE 14TH STREET. <br /> <br />5 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried <br /> <br />Benke explained that this matter has been dealt with <br />insufficiently and apologized to the various members <br />of the community who have been impacted by this matter <br />and that, after the last action, there seems to be two <br />different factors that are being looked at: (a) the <br />name change itself and (b) whether or not there should <br />be some requirements for a deposit. <br /> <br />In talking to other Councilmembers, Benke states they <br />are will i ng to support the name change but he doesn I t <br />think the majority supports the requirement of a deposit <br />as a factor of the name change. <br /> <br />Benke's opposition was to require a certain deposit. It <br />is his understanding that the action and motion that <br />was passed was a simple motion to change Innsbruck <br />Terrace to 14th Court. He further understands that the <br />Council needs an action to direct staff through a <br />resolution for the change. Consequently, a motion <br />would be effective to that extent. Benke further <br />stated that, at this point, the Council needs to either <br />revote on the original motion or start with a new <br />motion. <br /> <br />Page Seven <br /> <br />Work Session, Home Occupation <br />Ordinance - March 27, 1984 <br />Report 84-60 <br /> <br />Name Change - 14th Street <br />Report #84-22 <br />