Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />I <br />jl WHEREAS, the procedural history of-the application is as <br />follows: <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />1 <br />,I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />!' <br />11 <br />I: <br />I' <br />,I <br />'I <br />I- <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />ii <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />~ ..,_.''''t;\IIo <br /> <br />'1If ~ ."~ <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO 83-65 <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> <br />RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF <br />APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT,SP-110 <br /> <br />~ I> <br /> <br />WHEREAS, an application for a Special Use Permit, SP-110 <br />has been made by Tom Thumb and Pump'& Meter Service, Inc; and <br /> <br />1. That an application for SP-llOwas filed with the City <br />on April 26, 1983. <br />2. That the Planning Commission, pursuant to published <br />and mailed notices, held a public hearing on May 17, 1983, <br />all persons present at the hearing were given an <br />opportunity to be heard. <br />3. That, such appl ication was reviewed by the City Council <br />on May 24, 1983. <br />4. The written comments and analysis of the city staff, <br />the Planning Commission minutes and recommendations were <br />considered. <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the New Brighton City <br />Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to SP-l10: <br /> <br />1. The property is zoned B-2, Neighborhood Business District. <br />2. The property is adjacent to an R-l, Single Family <br />Residential District. <br />3. The proposal may be injurious to the use and enjoyment <br />of property in the vicinity, specifically the single <br />family homes. <br />4. Access roads or easement to adjoining property may be <br />impaired. <br />5. The proposal would be detrimental to the general welfare <br />of the neighborhood. <br />6. Several area residents and property owners spoke at the <br />Public Hearing in opposition citing traffic, litter, <br />access and concern for safety and property values as <br />problems. <br /> <br />, <br />II BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the application SP-110 is and <br />1/ hereby denied. <br /> <br />i! Adopted th i s ~ day of 114<( , 1983. <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />d <br />I' <br />d ATTEST: <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />,i <br />I <br />1 <br />I ~ _: ~ b-l.}-- :" '.' , <br /> <br /> <br />1-'-'''- _ .~"- .':: ' , <br />;'~ ......._ ,J __,0. <br /> <br />f['< :c"~~~ -'.- ',', ~ <br /> <br />~ ''''': ..-<..-..... <br /> <br />.."..,.... ._~ ~ --- . ""'-' <br />,-/ .-.-~I ................. " <br />'./", <br /> <br /> <br />City ~ianager <br /> <br /> <br />Ja <br /> <br />Egan, City Clerk <br /> <br />,",,- . <br />. '-", .. <br /> <br />-~.. <br />