Planning
Report
Date:
Case: NC02-6 / SP02-14 / LP02-12
Subject:
Special
Use Permit, Non-Conforming Use Permit & Site Plan Review
Applicant:
Request
The Planning Commission is
asked to hold a public hearing and consider an application by
The purpose of the request is
to construct a 24,100 square foot addition onto the existing 39,100 square foot
building and expand the parking area.
The site does not have
screening near the east lot line along the parking area and a portion of the
existing building and parking area encroach into the front yard setback. The Code identifies these as Type 4
Nonconforming Uses, which requires a public hearing. The nursing home use is a Special Use and any
expansion of the facility also requires a public hearing.
Findings
C Section 8-010, Site Plan Review
C Section 8-130, Special Use Standards
C Section 8-460 (2), Regulations as to Type 4
Nonconformities
Site
Characteristics
1. Location: 2800
I-694 Service Drive
2. Lot Size: 187,860
ft.2 (4.31 acres)
3. Topography: slopes to the north and sharp drop
off approaching
4. Vegetation: mature landscaping, including
cottonwood and buckthorn
5. Sensitive Areas: none
6. Comprehensive Plan Designation: PQ-P, Public Quasi-Public.
7. Zoning: R-3B,
Multifamily Residential
8. Surrounding
Land Uses:
North: Zoned R-2,
Two Family Residential
South: Interstate
694 Freeway
East:
Office
building &
West: Pecks Woods
Townhomes, Zoned R-3B.
Site
History
1. Past
Uses: Nursing
Home
2. Historical
Significance: None
Departmental
Considerations
Community
Development
1.
Building
Setbacks:
|
Required |
Existing / Proposed |
Front |
30 |
16’ (to |
Side |
10 |
45’ (to 52’ (to |
Rear |
30 |
(to Linden Dr.)249’ |
The southwest corner of the building encroaches into the
front yard setback for the I-694 Service Drive.
2.
Parking
& Drive Aisle Setbacks:
|
Required |
Existing / Proposed |
Front |
30’ |
18’ (to |
Side |
5’ |
6’ (to |
Rear |
5’ |
67’ (to Linden Dr.) |
The south parking area
encroaches into the front yard setback for the I-694 Service Drive; and, the landscape buffer screening the
off street parking spaces is inadequate.
See
Staff Notes below.
3. Parking
Spaces Required: 114 stalls
required
4. Parking
Spaces Proposed: 88 stalls
existing, 92 proposed, with 24 Proof of
Parking
Proof of parking for 24 stalls is shown
on plan for a total of 116 possible parking stalls
(2 more than required by
City Code)
5. Handicap
Parking: Required: 5 Stalls Existing/proposed: 5 Stalls
6. Stall
Size: 9
x 18 (complies)
7. Drive
Aisle Size (two way): Required:
24 feet Proposed: 24 feet
9. Driveway
Width: Maximum: 24 feet
Proposed: 24 feet
10. Concrete
Curbing: Existing
around parking and drive areas
11. Parking
Area Surface: Bituminous
12. Landscaping/Screening: mature landscaping along
building and parking areas. Landscaped
buffer along east parking lot is required (see Staff Notes below)
The
northern portion of the lot has mature trees worth saving, but also contains
old cottonwood trees that should be thinned out. Also, there are buckthorn specimens that
should be removed.
In examining submitted drawings, Staff is
concerned about snow plowing and snow storage plans. The screen of techny arborvitae between the
north parking lot and the pond may suffer from snow storage activities.
The applicant should revise the plan and
submit it for review and approval by Staff.
13. Impact
on Land Uses: None
Public
Works
1. Streets: The site
will be served by I-694 Service Drive and
2. Curb
Cuts: four.
3. Utilities:
Existing
4. Grading/Drainage: A pond is proposed for
the northeast corner of the site. This
pond is designed to work in conjunction with the pond on the adjacent site (
5. Rice Creek Watershed
District: Required.
6. Environmental
Concerns: None
7. Other
Considerations: none.
Building
Official
1. Existing Structure Size: 39,100 sq. ft.2
Proposed: 24,100
sq. ft.2
63,200
after construction
2. Structure
Height (required): 30’ or 3
stories, whichever is less
3. Structure
Height (proposed): 11’ east
elevation in west courtyard;
21’
6” north elevation
30’
on west elevation (complies).
4. Exterior
Treatment: Submitted
elevation plans show brick entryway columns, rock face concrete walls with
metal parapet caps. Some sections of the
new addition will have a veneer brick or stucco to match the existing building.
5. Mechanical Screening: Plans show stucco screens for
rooftop mechanical
equipment.
Fire
1. Hydrant
Locations:
along
east drive/parking area
2. Access
to Site: adequate
3. Access
to Structure: adequate
4. Other
Considerations: none.
Staff
Comments
Special Use Permit
As specified
in Section 8-130 of the New Brighton Zoning Ordinance, no special use shall be
recommended by the Planning Commission unless such shall find:
a. That the establishment, maintenance, or
operations of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public
health, safety, morals, comfort of the general public.
b. That the special use will not be
injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity
for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair
property values within the neighborhood.
c. That the establishment of the special use
will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the
surrounding property for uses permitted in the district.
d. That adequate utilities, access roads,
drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided.
e. That the special use shall, in all other
respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it
located.
Staff believes that the proposed addition will not be injurious to
the use and enjoyment of other properties in the area and that it does not
impede the development and improvement of other properties. The site conforms to all other applicable
regulations of the R-3B zone.
Type 4 nonconforming use permit:
The
purpose of the request is to construct an addition onto the existing
building. The site has three existing
non-conformities:
C
A
front yard (I-694 Service Drive) building setback encroachment of 14
feet on the southwest corner of the building [Section 4-440 (3) ];
C
A
front yard parking setback encroachment (I-694 Service Drive) of 12 feet on the southern parking area
[Section 11-020 (6)]; and,
C
Lack of screening between the properties to the east and the
north off street parking area [Section 11-010 (5)].
1. Building Setback Encroachment Issue
The
existing building encroaches 14 feet; the proposed expansion meets all setback
requirements.
The City Council approved a street vacation for
the portion of the Innsbruck parcel along the I-694 right-of-way on October 24,
1995 (see attached Council Report 95-195
and Resolution 95-092). Apparently
this was not recorded with
For purposes of analysis, Staff conducted the
site plan review with the submitted Survey, which, consequently, reveals a
setback non-conformity. Staff believes
that this is a administrative issue to be resolved by the landowner and
2. Parking Setback Encroachment Issue
The
parking lot on the south side nearest the I-694 Service Drive right-of-way
encroaches into the setback by 12 feet.
The applicant does not propose to address this non-conformity.
3. Screening of off street parking Issue
The
proposal is to buffer the parking areas by alternate fencing and plantings to
screen the adjacent properties to the east. The submitted landscape plans show
a staggered fence with tightly planted vegetation.
The
Zoning Code requires off street parking to be screened from adjacent
parcels. The Code allows screening to be
satisfied by an opaque fence, plantings, and earthen berm or some combination
of the foregoing.
Staff
believes this satisfies Section 11-010(5).
As specified
in Section 8-610 of the New Brighton
Zoning Ordinance, no Type 4 Non-conforming Use Permit shall be granted unless
one or more of the following conditions are met:
a. The total number of nonconformities is
reduced.
b. The impact of any nonconformities upon
adjacent premises is reduced to the greatest practical extent.
c. The extent of any nonconformity is reduced
where practical.
The
applicant is proposing to reduce the total number of nonconformities by adding fencing and
landscaping along the east lot line. The
applicant argues that the building setback encroachment will cease to be an
issue once the vacated right-of-way is recorded with
Staff believes that the conditions for approval
of the Non-Conforming Use Permit are met.
Public
Comment
Staff received emails from Linden Townhome
Association (north of the site) and directed inquiries to the applicant’s
representative. Staff spoke with
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends
approval of the non-conforming use permit and site plan subject to the
conditions outlined above.
Approval
Motion to waive the reading and adopt the attached
resolution recommending approval of the Non-conforming Use Permit and
Site Plan NC-02-004 and LP02-011 subject to the following
conditions:
1. Approval of a permit by the Rice Creek
Watershed District.
2. The right-of-way vacation approved by the
City of
3. The applicant shall work with City Staff
to modify the landscape plan to accommodate snow storage issues.
|
|
Resolution No.
City of