Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. ... ) <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 1580 <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> ,COQNTY OF RAMSEY <br /> CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> RESOLUTION APPROVING DRAFT PETITION AND POSITION PAPERS RELATING <br /> TO PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS BY RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT AND <br /> DIRECTING ADMINISTRATION TO INVESTIGATE ATTITUDE OF WATERSHED <br /> DISTRICT, PROBABLE COSTS AND PROBABLE FINANCING <br /> WHEREAS recent flooding, erosion and siltation of lakes and <br /> ponds in the City of New Brighton require certain repairs and <br /> improvements to County Ditches, control structures, culverts, ponds, <br /> and lakes, and <br /> WHEREAS the proper authority to make such repairs and <br /> improvements is the Rice Creek Watershed District, and <br /> WHEREAS it appears that the only feasible method of <br /> initiating consideration of the making of such repairs and <br /> improvements by the Rice Creek Watershed District is by petition <br /> by the City of New Brighton, and <br /> WHEREAS it is advisable for the City of New Brighton to <br /> first explore and investigate the attitude of the Watershed <br />'"," District toward such repairs and improvements and to ascertain <br /> the probable costs and method of financing, and <br /> WHEREAS a Draft Petition and position papers setting forth <br /> the City's proposed petition and the City's position on certain <br /> aspects of such proposed repairs and improvements will assist <br /> the Watershed District to develop attitudes regarding the <br /> proposal, probable costs and probable financing <br /> NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED,by the New Brighton City <br /> Council that the attached Draft Petition and Position Papers are <br /> hereby approved as to form and content <br /> BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the administration is hereby <br /> directed to present the Draft Petition and Position Papers, to- <br /> gether with a copy, of this resolution to the Rice Creek Watershed <br /> District officials, consultants and staff for the purpose of <br /> determining the following: <br /> 1. The attitude of the District toward the proposal or <br /> any part thereof. <br /> 2. Any suggested additions, revisions or deletions in <br /> the Draft Petition. <br /> 3. The response of the District to any or all of the <br /> Position Papers. <br /> 4. The probable cost of the repairs and improvements by <br /> section and in total. <br /> 5. The probable method of financing the repairs and <br /> improvements. "'.;:. <br /> 6. The probable timetable if the proposal is in fact <br /> petitioned for. <br />