My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
97-011
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Resolutions
>
Resolutions 1997
>
97-011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/3/2005 3:04:55 PM
Creation date
8/2/2005 3:56:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. .~ <br /> <br />," <br /> <br />'! <br /> <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 97-011 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION REQUESTING REPRESENTATION FROM <br />LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST <br />FOR APPEAL <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of New Brighton is a defendant along with the Minnesota Police <br /> <br />Recruitment System, a Minnesota joint powers organization ("MPRS"), and 35 other Minnesota <br /> <br />cities in two companion civil actions in Hennepin County District Court entitled Fields v. MPRS. <br /> <br />et al. and Starks v. MPRS. et aI., District Court File Numbers EM 93-218 and EM 93-219 <br /> <br />(collectively referred to as the "Action"); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by Order dated October 5, 1994, the court found that the entry level police <br /> <br />officer selection procedures used by the defendants violated the Minnesota Human Rights Act; <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, by Order dated November 7, 1996, the court made the defendants subject to <br /> <br />the continuing jurisdiction of the court until January 1, 2004; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said orders establish standards for review of employee selection procedures <br /> <br />which will be extraordinarily difficult to satisfy; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, said orders may be cited as precedent in future challenges to employee <br /> <br />selection procedures of Minnesota cities which will be defended by the League of Minnesota <br /> <br />Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT); and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City and other defendant cities may have future employment practices <br /> <br />challenged in the context ofthe Action under the continuing jurisdiction of the court, which will <br /> <br />be defended by the LMCIT; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.