My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
VN-136
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Variance Files PLZ 02400
>
VN 101-200
>
VN-136
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2007 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
2/21/2007 4:13:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />VN-136 <br />November 12, 1974 <br />8:25 P.M. <br />Request: Approval of variance from Zoning Code Section 10-120(e) <br />to allow construction; of industrial building with 47' <br />height <br />Applicant: Kausel Foundry <br />Location: 350 1st Street SW <br />Discussion° <br />The applicant is proposing 4 major expansion of his present <br />facility. In preparing final plans for the proposed expansion <br />the architect found it necessary to raise a portion of the roof <br />to a 47' height. The additionalheight is to allow installation <br />of pollution control equipment. Rather than set this equipment:on <br />the roof, as is frequently done, the roof has been raised in -this <br />area and the equipment enclosed within the building. This will <br />allow better maintenance, reduce wear and tear due to weather,. <br />and improve the aesthetics of the building. Were this equipment <br />simply set on the roof and not enclosed, it would not be considered <br />part of the building height. <br />The Fire Department has raised no objection regarding the <br />additional height. They did suggest that fire hydrants be <br />installed on the east and west sides of the building. This <br />suggestion has been incorporated in the plans <br />Planning Commission Consideration (10-15-74): <br />The Chairman read the background discussion; <br />Thomas Stahl, architect for the applicant, and Chuck <br />Kausel were present to answer questions. <br />Harty asked if the 40' height limitation was the result of <br />a concern for fire protection. <br />The Building and Planning Coordinator stated that he did <br />not know the origin.of this specific requirement and-that he had <br />not yet received any commentary from the Fire Department regarding <br />the plans.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.