81-2452 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

!:., '.. ~ F !:i, j I'; J 'I I, " ~ (, h i! I' II II I RESOLUTION NO 2452 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMEY CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON RESOLUTION MAKING FI NDI NGS OF FACT AND APPROVING APPLI CATION FOR VARIANCE, VN - 219 ... WHEREAS, An application for a variance entitled VN-219 has been made by North Innsbruck Associates to have less than the required number of parking spaces; and II Ii II i WHEREAS, The procedural history of the application is as follows: 1. That an appl icati on for vari ance, VN-219 was filed with the Ci ty of New Brighton on April 13, 1981. 2. That such application was reviewed by the New Brighton Planning COlTHl1ission Board of Review on April 22,1981. 3. That the City Council, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public hearing on May 12,1981, all person1s present at the hearing were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. The written comments and analysis of the City staff, the Planning COJl1Tlission minutes and recommendations were considered. ,I II I' !I 'I II II 'I II I ~ Ii :1 Ij h I'! I n II Ii I I i r !! II H l' II I ! I ! ; , II r J I! Ii p " I ~ II 'I I. II 'I 1\ NOW THEREFORE BElT RESOLVED, That the New Brighton City Council makes the following Findings of Fact in respect to VN-219: 1. That the property is zoned B-1, L imi ted Bus i ness; 2. That the site was developed for a 2-story office building under Council approved buildi ng permi t, LP-82 an~ Vari ance, VN-204; 3. That the applicant proposed to amend previous permits by occupying for office use the basement of said buildi ng; 4. That the appli cant will be acqui ri ng additi ona 1 property to accommodate additional parking spaces; 5. That the City Council held a public hearing on April 21, 1981 on a revised zoning code pursuant to the implementation section of the Comprehensive Plan; and 6. That the proposed parking design and number of spaces is consistent with the proposed zoning code presently under consideration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVE~, That the ~PPlication VN-219 is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: 1. That the applicant acqu,i re the necessary property to conform with the sjite plan submitted; , 2. That such mi nor subdivi s ion be:filed :w-ith, the Ci ty within 30 days; 3. That the building code violations be abated within 30 days; 4. That the redesigned parking lot is-:cpmpletedwithin six months; 5. That at least two (2), pine trees, 61 ta"81 be plantE:itl to the east of the existing building; 6. That failure to comply with the above conditions within the given time periods nullifies the approval of the variance request; 7. That in the event the above conditions are not met staff is directed to: A. Write up orders requiring that the tenants vacate the basement withi n 10 days; B. Continue prosecution of UBC violations; and C. If basement is not vacated within 10 days. staff shall write out a citation for the zoning code violations and turn the matter over to the City Prosecutor for further action. 8. That the applicant shall notify the tenants in writing of the con- ditions of the variance and outline the consequences if those conditions are not met. thi s lJ. ftl day of (\-I::>.y Adopted ----~'''-......,.,'-............. cJ - ~ - - . . '" -,.'.'~ -- ~~-.,~~:. "--.:r::"',_ ...... ~~ . - A!TES-T <::... ' ' ~;""', ; ~,,-p~i; tl~~ Vern~: .U'ed~S~!f,.,"C 1 erk . - \..~ -'. (SEA1S,-.- .. " . ~' ...;' ............~"""~