My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-2005 (2)
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Minutes
>
2005
>
10-18-2005 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 8:58:16 PM
Creation date
4/16/2007 4:53:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r- Approved <br /> November 15, 2005 j <br /> The submitted survey indicates a driveway encroachment into the side yard setback. The <br /> required setback is 5 feet; the applicant plans to construct the accessory structure first, <br /> and then re-pave his driveway in the spring of 2006. <br /> Motion by Zisla, Second Schiferl by to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br /> 5 Ayes, 0 Nays, MOTION CARRIED. <br /> After additional discussion by the Commission and Staff there was a Motion by Schiferl <br /> Second by O'Keefe to WAIVE THE READING AND ADOPT THE ATTACHED <br /> RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SP 05-15 with the following <br /> condition: <br /> 1. The driveway is brought into conformance by May 1, 2006 by having the new <br /> driveway extend all the way back to the new garage and by making the <br /> appropriate changes to abide by the setback guidelines. <br /> 5 Ayes, 0 Nays. MOTION CARRIED to recommend APPROVAL. <br /> Public Hearing: GP05-01Amend the General Development Plan/ PUD for Main <br /> Street Village <br /> Consideration of an amendment to the General Development Plan/PUD for Main Street <br /> Village to allow for a change in land uses. Pratt Ordway wishes the City to consider an <br /> amendment to the General Development Plan/PUD for Main Street Village to allow the <br /> restaurant component of the project to be located in building E and a retail post office <br /> component to be located in Building D. This proposal is in conflict with the approved <br /> General Development Plan/PUD for Main Street Village. Pratt Ordway would like to <br /> modify the approved plan to accommodate a different tenant mix in Building D and E. <br /> The developer can no longer precede negotiations with the post office until the PUD is <br /> approved. <br /> Gary Nordness, Essential Real Estate Services, approached the commission and answered <br /> questions from the commissioners regarding the plaza, the square feet of the post office, <br /> and the possible draw backs of having a post office located by a restaurant. He reiterated <br /> that they would be back before the commission with the finalized plans and that they <br /> would be looking for the commissions input on how the post office and plaza area is laid <br /> out. <br /> O'Keefe asked Fernelius if the post office purchased the land, if it would modify the <br /> PUD. Fernelius replied that the PUD decides the use of the land and if the post office <br /> decides to purchase the property there would be no change. Mr.Nordes added that as of <br /> now the post office has a lease and there is no plan on them purchasing the land. <br /> O'Keefe inquired if the post office was using the applicant's architects. Nordes <br /> I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\Minutes\2005\10-18-2005.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.