My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1-31-2006 Special meeting regarding NWQ (2)
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Minutes
>
2006
>
1-31-2006 Special meeting regarding NWQ (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2021 9:46:24 PM
Creation date
4/16/2007 4:54:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved <br /> Greenfield approached the Commission and addressed Commissioners Schiferl's concerns. She <br /> stated that David Bernard Builder and Developers focus has primarily been on urban, in fill, and <br /> brown field type sites. The first sustainability and green use that they are addressing is reuse and <br /> reclaiming of an area that is currently undesirable. They have asked Excel Energy to do an <br /> energy modeling on their senior buildings and they are doing their home efficiency review on all <br /> of the town home buildings. Excel will be looking at everything, from how the buildings will be <br /> constructed to what light switches will be used. Excel will then come in and use a blower door <br /> test to see if the building meets its design standards. They also are constructing smaller homes <br /> which cost less to heat and maintain. Excel will not be done with their review for quite some <br /> time and will not coincide with the planning process. They will be including rain sensors on all <br /> the water irrigation systems, so if it is raining the sprinkler systems will not go on. They are not <br /> supportive of green water recycling; they just don't have the capacity or area to do that in this <br /> development. They currently have pilot program going on at another development site, which <br /> they use multi-sort containers for construction recycling. They will not know the results of the <br /> program at this point and time, but they will look at doing a similar program here if it is <br /> successful. She added that the City will need to decide how the recycling program will work for <br /> this housing development, will the haulers be able to go into the development or will they <br /> required a one spot recycling container. Their garages are designed to allow for multiple <br /> recycling and garbage containers. They currently are not supportive of using recycled or low voc <br /> paints, because they are not widely available and the color selection is narrow, however they will <br /> consider them as they become more accessible. Home buyers will have the opportunity to <br /> purchase recycled tiles and carpet from the tile and carpet stores and they may be willing to <br /> provide some education about those materials. They do use certified lumber, which means that <br /> the forest that the wood is cut from is sustainable and renewable. They also use OSB products, <br /> which is made from recyclable woods products. The City is responsible for the design of the <br /> storm water retention system. The City's Engineering Depaitinent has decided to handle the <br /> storm water with typical detention ponds, which is pond and pipes. They have asked the <br /> developers to include infiltration benches, so when the water rises to a certain point the water will <br /> fan out and have an opportunity to infiltrate back into the soil before it over flows. David <br /> Bernard is looking a putting swale,rain guard or small basin along the rail road track,but not bio- <br /> engineered trenches. Greenfield stated that they are willing to continue to have conversations <br /> regarding this issue and will continue to look at products that will ensure sustainability and green <br /> use. Schiferl stated that this was a much more satisfactory answer; he will continue to bring this <br /> topic up and will look to see if these items are being done. <br /> O'Keefe recommended amendments to the Recommendation of Approval to the following Items: <br /> Item number 2 to show that the central and northern trail connections are part of the site plan, <br /> Item 6 add "and revisions to provide easements to trails and private streets as deemed necessary <br /> by the City Engineer", the listing of approved building material should have it's own item which <br /> could come after the typical building elevations, Item 12 should read the "trails and trail bridge <br /> should hold the weight of a patrol car", and Item 13A "clarification of maintenance <br /> responsibilities for land dedicated for park space or trails within the preliminary plat." Greenfield <br /> stated they do not anticipate constructing the bridge to hold a patrol car, but they do support the <br /> tunnel being made wide enough to allow a patrol car to pass through. They have designed the <br /> trials wide and strong enough to allow a Jeep to travel on them. Schiferl inquired if <br /> Commissioner O'Keefe's suggestion of Item 12 should be removed. Baker replied that it should <br /> stay in,but that the language to"support the weight of a patrol car"would be removed. <br /> C:\Documents and Settings\jgoepe\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28\1-31-2006 Special <br /> meeting regarding NWQ.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.