Laserfiche WebLink
Justification <br /> Park land dedication fees are charged for residential development in order to <br /> ensure that there is the necessary land and/or funds dedicated to public parks. <br /> The same rationale can be applied for commercial/industrial park land dedication <br /> fees as well. <br /> Currently, the General Fund provides the majority of funding for capital projects <br /> through the park's non-fleet internal charge. Significant resources will continue to <br /> be necessary in order to responsibly repair, renovate, and maintain the City's <br /> existing park infrastructure in the coming years. In addition, the City will consider <br /> expanding its park system through the acquisition of the Baptist Seminary's <br /> Jones Lake property. The 27 acre parcel is equivalent to approximately fifteen <br /> percent of the City's current park land inventory. A commercial/industrial park <br /> land dedication fee could potentially assist in offsetting General Fund expenses <br /> in future years. All revenue would continue to be dedicated to Fund 403: Parks <br /> Capital Projects, which is reserved for park planning, renovation, acquisition, and <br /> development. <br /> MRPA Survey <br /> In 2003, the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association conducted a Park <br /> Dedication Rates survey of its member cities (see attachment). Twenty-seven <br /> cities responded and of those, only Buffalo, Crosslake, New Brighton, and New <br /> Hope did not charge commercial/industrial park dedication fees. However, <br /> beginning in 2004, New Hope did approve the implementation of a C/I fee. <br /> If the City Code is revised to include commercial/industrial park land dedication <br /> fees, I recommend that the initial fee for commercial/industrial developments be <br /> $2,500 per acre. This is consistent with New Hope's fee, which has many of the <br /> same redevelopment issues facing the City. The average fee of the other <br /> responding communities is much higher, but the many of the communities are <br /> still experiencing growth and park land acquisition and development is a <br /> significant portion of their community's development. <br /> I would appreciate an opportunity to discuss my recommendation with you, Dan, <br /> and staff from the Community Development Department. If the decision is made <br /> to proceed, the Parks, Recreation, and Environmental Commission could review <br /> a formal proposal at their October meeting. It may also be advantageous to <br /> review this with the Economic Development Commission and Planning <br /> Commission prior to presenting a recommendation for City Council consideration. <br /> G:\DATA\FSC\WP\CORRESP\2004\Steve\C-1 park dedication.doc <br />