Laserfiche WebLink
<br />A <br /> Minutes <br />p <br /> <br /> New Brighton Planning Commission <br /> Regular Meeting - February 16, 1999 <br />pr <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />Call to Order <br />o <br />Larry Baker, Chair, called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br /> <br />v <br /> Present: Larry Baker, Mike Livingston (late), Norm Schiferl, David Schmitz, <br />Jeff Schopf <br />Absent: <br /> Jim O’Brien, Paul Zisla <br /> <br />: <br />Also Present <br /> Kevin Locke, Director of Community Development <br />e <br />Cary Teague, City Planner <br />Steve Larson, City Council Liaison <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes <br />d <br />J19,1999, <br />Motion by Schopf, seconded by Schopf, <br />TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE ANUARY <br />PC. <br /> 4 Ayes - 0 Nays. Motion Carried. <br />LANNING OMMISSION MEETING AS WRITTEN <br /> <br /> <br />Report on Council Action <br />Larson said the Council was not considering any new items. <br /> <br />Agenda Review <br />“Conditions of Variances” was added to Announcements and Updates. <br /> <br />Administrative Appeal <br />Administrative Appeal Crosson Limited Partnership/Kolstad Company, Inc. <br />Teague briefly reviewed the planning report concerning an appeal of the administrative determination of City <br />Staff that the applicants’ request to construct a 29,171 square foot trailer repair facility, including outside <br />storage of trailers, and to assemble and fabricate special order enclosures, sell trailer parts and equipment, <br />and sell truck equipment and accessories. The applicants feel that the use should be a permitted use within the <br />I-1, Light Industrial Zoning District. The subject property is located at 600 Lakeview Point. <br /> <br />Baker stated that, considering the permitted uses in the I-1 and I-2 District, there is no question that the <br />proposed use would be an I-2 use. Therefore, Baker said he would not support the appeal. Schopf stated staff <br />has done a good job of interpreting the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant does not have reasonable grounds <br />for this appeal. <br /> <br />Baker asked if the applicant wished to speak. Chris Barnes, an attorney representing Crosson Limited <br />Partnership, the contract purchaser, said the president of Kolstad Company Inc., the user, was also present. <br />Barnes said the applicant wanted to be sure it had adequately communicated the proposed use, especially <br />pertaining to fabrication. Barnes said his client’s tenant did not assemble boxes. The boxes are already <br />manufactured when they come to the site. The tenant then modifies them. The description, “fabrication,” <br />probably is inadequate and incomplete. The boxes are manufactured before they come to the site. Barnes said <br /> <br />I:\COMMISSIONS\PLANNING\MINUTES\1999\02-16-99.WPD <br /> <br />